Rule of Thumb on 3 way driver SPL's. - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14th September 2005, 05:35 AM   #1
2litre is offline 2litre  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bremerton, WA.
Default Rule of Thumb on 3 way driver SPL's.

I have a quick question concerning SPL of multiple drivers in open baffle.

-If I was building an open baffle speaker using 2 or 3 drivers, what would the Rule of Thumb be as to which driver should have the higher SPL and which one should have the lower SPL if all couldn't be had with the same numbers?-

More to the point, I'm looking at building a version of the Visaton NoBox speaker using Pioneer drivers from PartsExpress, specifically the 15" Woofer #290-175 (A38GU40-52F-Q) and the 8" full range #290-045 (B20FU20-51FW). The 15" has an SPL of 96db and the 8" is 94db. This seems OK to me since open baffle speakers are said to be a bit shy on bass. Visaton says the 15" is a 'bass augmentation speaker' and in this application its 20Hz Fs should do just that.

When I searched 'open baffle' in the Full Range forum I found quite a bit of discussion on the Pioneer B20FU20-51FW. I got the impression I may not be satisfied with the high end and might end up adding a tweeter to the set up, hence my question concerning the Rule of Thumb on SPL of multiple drivers. If I needed to add a tweeter, should it be more or less efficient than the 8" full range? For discussion lets use either Pioneer GT-1025 (PE#280-062) at 90db and GT-1005 (PE#270-011) at 94db.

I hope that's enough info to generate a response.

Thank You,

Jim
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2005, 09:58 PM   #2
simon5 is offline simon5  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Québec, Québec
The tweeter should be more efficient because it's easy to use a couple of resistors to bring it at the same level as the fullrange.

If the tweeter is 2-4 dB more efficient than the woofer, you also have the option of adding a 2nd woofer to correct the situation.
__________________
DIYaudio for President !
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2005, 10:39 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Cloth Ears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
I'd agree with Simon5 - either more, or the same, efficiency. It's pretty easy to lpad the tweeter down in a passive situation. And if you're active, then it doesn't really matter either way. IMO they should be reasonably close, though, as I think it's a waste if you have to pad a 94dB tweeter to match an 84dB mid (not in 2litre's case though).
__________________
Jont.
"It is impossible to build a fool proof system; because fools are so ingenious."
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2005, 06:45 AM   #4
Ricky is offline Ricky  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Default Re: Rule of Thumb on 3 way driver SPL's.

If you're working on a multi range speaker, whether it is 2, 3, or 4 way, always work on the assumption that the woofer has the lowest SPL. The reasons for this are many. The woofer will have reduced SPL if it has a rolled rubber surround as opposed to a foam or linen edge. There is always a trade off and, as Simon5 says, you can always "pad" a unit down to suit.

In 3 way systems, remember that you are going to use a bandpass filter working between 500 and 4000Hz. You may need to equalise this. I have yet to hear a true 3 way system that works. 2 and a half way systems seem to be the order of the day. The tweeter can be any SPL from 4Db upwards from the other drive units. In a 2 way system, 2nd order filters work for the bass with 3rd order filters for the treble. When you design the network, always use a 3rd order target response. Our AK3 uses a 1st order for the bass and 3rd order for the treble and got 5 stars in What HiFi.

Ricky.
www.arcaydis.co.uk
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2005, 08:21 AM   #5
Salas is offline Salas  Greece
diyAudio Chief Moderator
 
Salas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Athens-Greece
There is something that I almost never see mentioned. Every time a filter with cap(s) is put before a tweeter there is a loss of roughly 1.5 to 2.5 dB from medium uf to 2.2uf range. This is before any resistive attenuation is applied and is stronger in the last octave. Simulators dont account for that. I use a -.5V reference generator for the tweeter in LEAP 5 to balance the loss... The akward old Calsod was wiser in this respect!
Series filters are the most efficient in this respect. They lose less, or nothing if 6dB.
-So please make allowance for the above loss when choosing your TW SPL.
-Mids can be less efficeint since their output is boosted by sidebands energy and its better not to use resistors to pad them down.
-Woofers are the rulers of overall SPL because they face BSC loss and absorption loss from box stuffing depending on what and how much.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rule of thumb for BIAS current in class A azira Pass Labs 4 31st January 2007 12:12 AM
Is there a rule of thumb for calculating the transormer's VA rating? Bricolo Solid State 16 23rd June 2006 12:22 PM
Thumb Rule for determining Approx output power of class AB amp rajeev luthra Solid State 12 3rd August 2004 07:34 PM
No. of parallel BJT? Rule of thumb? sam9 Solid State 4 26th April 2004 10:48 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:25 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2