|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jakarta
|
This is from Speaker Workshop:
"Tweeters are really just drivers with built-in enclosures. They come in 2nd order and 4th order (most often) depending on whether or not they are a vented design. A 2nd order tweeter melded with the right 2nd order crossover can produce a good 4th order acoustic crossover. When using a 4th order tweeter use a higher order crossover to improve power handling." How do you know that they are 4th order or 2nd order tweeter? And how can this relate to a vented (box)? Anyone care to explain? I'm also confused with the last statement
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
|
The rate of the natural acoustic rolloff of the tweeter is 2nd or 4th order, determined by the mechanical properties of the tweeter.
Then when you apply a 2nd order XO you get 4th order etc. Virtually all tweeters have no rear wave so loading in a cabinet makes no difference. Baffle step does make differences though. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Cruz, California
|
Using the tweeter rolloff is not the optimal way to use them, because tweeters have limited excursion and you would run into distortion fairly quickly if you cross them over low enough to use the rolloff as a part of the crossover.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Austin
|
Which is part of the explanation of the last sentence, re: the power handling.
__________________
Jesus loves you. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jakarta
|
Oh, thank you all. I see it now...
So the rate of the order can simply be seen from the relative steepness of the natural roll-off graph/pattern. Whatever causes that! Initially I thought the 'vented' design has something to do with tweeter chambers, because what has it to do with speaker enclosure? So the statement is referring to crossing the tweeter at it's natural roll-off to create higher order natural/accoustic filter, and because it is close to Fs (especially for 4th order natural roll-off?????) then high order filter is mandatory to improve power handling. DSP_Geek, some tweeters like Dynaudio D21 like to be crossed near Fs. Only for low SPL and that's the headache indeed. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Santa Cruz, California
|
Quote:
I'm not saying you're wrong, just that I don't know the variables about the time you tried it. I still prefer to cross my tweeters at least an octave above Fs. Cone mids, on the other hand, are entirely fair game for this approach. Francois. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: sydney nsw
|
Acoustically a closed back driver is a second order high pass filter, and if it has a q=.707, cascading it with a Butterworth filter of the same frequency gives an exact L-R type chracteristic. Crossing it over at any other frequency will not give this due to residual phase shift, unless a Linkwitz transform "bi-quad" filter is used.
There also exist "quasi L-R" crossovers that allow crossovers in the f3-2f3 region of the tweeter, whilst still retaining the in phase through the crossover region property of the L-R. |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jakarta
|
Quote:
XT25 is the best exception. Initially I thought the Quality/Price will be lower to cross it at high Fc, actually I found the opposite tends to be true. But I still have some doubt about the 'true' x-over point of XT25 crossover. If you 'cross' XT25 and another tweeter at the same frequency and order, the XT25 will outputs more vocal (and is very sweet ) as if it has shallower roll-off, and it seems it still takes the benefit of low Fs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jakarta
|
Quote:
With Fs at 1K3, what F will you cross the tweeter at? I have had plenty of headaches crossing woofers at 3K |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Speaker Workshop, help please | Grahamt | Multi-Way | 5 | 10th March 2005 12:48 PM |
| Speaker Workshop do all this? | rick57 | Multi-Way | 8 | 20th November 2004 03:11 PM |
| A little Speaker Workshop help | kneadle | Multi-Way | 18 | 25th October 2004 11:12 PM |
| Which mic for speaker workshop? | azira | Multi-Way | 2 | 12th February 2004 06:12 PM |
| Speaker workshop | Ilianh | Multi-Way | 2 | 10th January 2003 10:11 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12748 seconds (78.91% PHP - 21.09% MySQL) with 10 queries |