Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th September 2005, 09:41 AM   #1
Speek is offline Speek  Netherlands
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Default Rear or front port?

I'm thinking about doing Zaph's Seas L18 / Seas 27TBFCG project for a friend. But she insists that they will be placed on wall-mounted (Vogels's) supports. This means that there will only be 7 cm space between the wall and the rear of the box. Zaph uses rear vented boxes, but in this situation would it be better to put the port(s) in the baffle?
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th September 2005, 09:58 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
tarnationsauce's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oregon
Send a message via AIM to tarnationsauce Send a message via MSN to tarnationsauce Send a message via Yahoo to tarnationsauce
Rear mounting a port does a couple things:

Makes corner loading more effective for low frequencies.
Reduces the appearance of port noise.
Allows a smaller enclosure face.

But...

Like you say, you cannot wall mount a rear ported enclosure.
The rule of thumb is to mount an enclosure the distance equal to the width of the port from the wall for the port to work as it was designed.

I think you'll be fine with front porting.
I once tested front, side, and rear porting before with a subwoofer I was designing. Tested with an RTA. I had more SPL, smoother response, and better LF extention with a front ported enclosure. But of course there are a TON of variables. With the particular design I was using, front porting was superior. Side porting was hideous! Rear porting was actually pretty close to front porting But there were a couple noticeable dips in frequency response. My only guess is it was from wave misalignment of those frequencies coming from the port and cone. Which makes sense because the rear mounted port is 180deg out of phase with the cone. In fact I'm supprised rear porting works as good as it does.
__________________
.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rear port and front port barry.childs Multi-Way 10 27th February 2009 10:46 AM
Front or rear port placement? JLC7 Multi-Way 14 26th May 2008 09:04 PM
front or rear port blu_line Multi-Way 3 12th March 2004 02:20 PM
rear port vs front port Jimmy154 Multi-Way 22 6th March 2004 09:38 AM
Rear vs. Front Port squidbait Multi-Way 11 21st January 2004 01:10 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:41 AM.

Page generated in 0.07286 seconds (72.61% PHP - 27.39% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio