L-R 3rd order passive x-over - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th September 2005, 05:18 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Default L-R 3rd order passive x-over

I am trying to find the design specs for a L-R 3rd order passive x-over and keep coming up short. Does anyone out there have the specs or a link to an online calculator that includes the L-R 3rd?

Thanks in advance!
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th September 2005, 05:47 AM   #2
banana is offline banana  Hong Kong
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Hong Kong
There wouldn't be any. L-R could only be even order.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th September 2005, 07:08 AM   #3
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Hi,
I have heard the same, only even order.
Why?
Surely if the Q can be made = 0.5 for both the low pass and high pass then L-R follows. Can anyone explain why not?
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th September 2005, 09:15 AM   #4
rcw is offline rcw  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: sydney nsw
Default re L-R

In his original paper Linkwitz pointed out the lobe wandering effect caused by two drivers being out of phase through the crossover region. He showed that lobe wandering does not occur for the second order Butterworth filter, but the amplitude responce adds to a 3db. peak, a q=.5, .707^2, being nessesary to flatten this peak. Riley pointed out that a filter that is in phase and sums to a flat amplitude is a Butterworth squared one, i.e. the second order L-R filter is the convolution of two first order sections, this being so all L-R filters must be even order since any number squared is always even.
Third order Butterworth filters are all pass since they have a constant quadrature phase shift between the two outputs, but the phase shift causes lobe wandering and the primary aim of the L-R filter is to remove this.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th September 2005, 09:51 AM   #5
Jay is offline Jay  Indonesia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Jakarta
In normal use, eg. background music listening, do this lobing characteristics have clear benefit or audible?
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th September 2005, 12:34 AM   #6
rcw is offline rcw  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: sydney nsw
Default lobing

Linkwitz claims these effects to be audible. The total amount of wandering that occurs sems to be in the 15-20 degrees region, this would seem to be more of a problem with narrower vertical lobes, i.e. crossover frequencies at which the centre to centre distance is much greater than a wavelength.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th September 2005, 06:09 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Interesting!

I am building a car audio system using some Focal TN45 tweeters and it looks like an 18 dB slope would suit my system best (along with alot of attenuation)!

Without having the benefit of a L-R design, do I have other options to flatten the frequency response so as not to yield a 3 dB gain at the cutoff?

Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th September 2005, 08:50 AM   #8
rcw is offline rcw  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: sydney nsw
Default re crossovers

The general rule for crossover systems is that if the tweeter is crossed over at least an octave above its resonant frequency then the result is in practice good enough, since acoustic offset causes more abheration than the drivers own transfer function.
This is the critical matter, the L-R crossover assumes that the transfer functions of the drivers are sufficiently small in phase shift so that the filter function predominates.
There are exact, at least through the crossover region, solutions that have been described by Thiele and Leach, these are the quasi L-R types of crossovers, the Leach type requires that the crossover frequency of the tweeter is 1.85 times its resonant frequency and is third order Butterworth, the l.f. driver being 4th. order L-R.
The Thiele sort has a fifth order tweeter crossover and a fourth order woofer one with the crossover frequency at around 1.1 times the tweeter resonance.
In practice if the acoustic centres are not aligned the crossover region always has ripple of some sort even when the driver transfer functions are taken into account and practicle crossovers are tweaked to give the flatest overall curve.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1st order Passive Line Level Crossover + 2nd order Highpass? alexclaber Multi-Way 11 4th January 2008 07:15 PM
Passive pre order? leadbelly Tubes / Valves 3 16th September 2006 02:54 PM
Jordan JX92S + Hi-Vi D10G + passive 1st order crossover? Dumbass Multi-Way 3 26th July 2005 11:57 AM
dB loss by using passive crossovers? Active vs Passive and 1st vs 4th order Hybrid fourdoor Multi-Way 3 11th July 2004 09:16 PM
4th Order Bandpass with Passive Radiator ? audioaction Subwoofers 2 17th December 2003 12:44 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:49 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2