dimensioning of comp coils ("active Faradays") - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Gallery Wiki Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th September 2005, 03:32 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Germany
Default dimensioning of comp coils ("active Faradays")

This thread here

turned into a discussion of comp coils. Not wanting to further promote thread creep, I started a new one.

A comp coil is a stationary coil that sits somewhere on the pole piece and is driven by an AC current that makes it cancel the AC field of the VC.

The advantage of a comp coil is that it works down to very low frequencies where passive Faradays are hardly effective, the disadvantage being that it generates heat and wastes efficiency.

It can be used to inhibit flux modulation, which is probably the simplest case. In this case, it could sit at the base of the pole piece, using the pole piece as a transformer core. It can be connected in series to the VC (+ same current as in VC, - higher Re, lower damping, not really an issue as thick wire can be used because there is ample space for the comp coil in this position). In this case, one would probably choose the same number of turns as the VC has.

The problem one faces is that the part of the VC that extends above the top plate does couple as well as the rest of the system. What is more, it changes with displacement. I would assume that the top windings of the VC still contribute significantly to the field inside the bottom end of the VC, so this should not be this much of an issue.

The other problem is that pole piece is ususally already near saturation, so the coupling between VC and comp coil could become nonlinear.

It will be a while until I can do simulations again, so if anyone (Bill?) could do some simulations on the two problems, this would be really great.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2013, 06:23 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
I have seen some discussion on this forum about this concept.
Has anyone here actually done it?
  Reply With Quote


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What makes an amplifier "bright", "warm", or "neutral"? JohnS Solid State 51 13th December 2009 06:42 PM
"Active Woofer" for Music inrank Subwoofers 2 12th October 2007 09:07 PM
"active grounding" - why would one use it? jarthel Everything Else 28 20th July 2007 07:51 AM
Removable "Active Brace" polkymon Multi-Way 9 14th October 2006 09:04 PM
Noob question : what exactly is the "Q" of an active filter ? youyoung21147 Chip Amps 7 10th December 2005 09:39 PM

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:29 AM.

vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2017 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2