Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

dimensioning of comp coils ("active Faradays")
dimensioning of comp coils ("active Faradays")
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th September 2005, 04:32 PM   #1
capslock is offline capslock  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Germany
Default dimensioning of comp coils ("active Faradays")

This thread here
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...846#post717846

turned into a discussion of comp coils. Not wanting to further promote thread creep, I started a new one.

A comp coil is a stationary coil that sits somewhere on the pole piece and is driven by an AC current that makes it cancel the AC field of the VC.

The advantage of a comp coil is that it works down to very low frequencies where passive Faradays are hardly effective, the disadvantage being that it generates heat and wastes efficiency.

It can be used to inhibit flux modulation, which is probably the simplest case. In this case, it could sit at the base of the pole piece, using the pole piece as a transformer core. It can be connected in series to the VC (+ same current as in VC, - higher Re, lower damping, not really an issue as thick wire can be used because there is ample space for the comp coil in this position). In this case, one would probably choose the same number of turns as the VC has.

The problem one faces is that the part of the VC that extends above the top plate does couple as well as the rest of the system. What is more, it changes with displacement. I would assume that the top windings of the VC still contribute significantly to the field inside the bottom end of the VC, so this should not be this much of an issue.

The other problem is that pole piece is ususally already near saturation, so the coupling between VC and comp coil could become nonlinear.


It will be a while until I can do simulations again, so if anyone (Bill?) could do some simulations on the two problems, this would be really great.
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th June 2013, 07:23 PM   #2
johnc is offline johnc
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
I have seen some discussion on this forum about this concept.
Has anyone here actually done it?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


dimensioning of comp coils ("active Faradays")Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What makes an amplifier "bright", "warm", or "neutral"? JohnS Solid State 51 13th December 2009 07:42 PM
"Active Woofer" for Music inrank Subwoofers 2 12th October 2007 10:07 PM
"active grounding" - why would one use it? jarthel Everything Else 28 20th July 2007 08:51 AM
Removable "Active Brace" polkymon Multi-Way 9 14th October 2006 10:04 PM
Noob question : what exactly is the "Q" of an active filter ? youyoung21147 Chip Amps 7 10th December 2005 10:39 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:48 AM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 16.67%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2017 diyAudio
Wiki