crossover design... suspect data?? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th September 2005, 02:07 AM   #1
just another
diyAudio Moderator
 
wintermute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney
Blog Entries: 22
Default crossover design... suspect data??

OK I mostly finished one of my cabinets... I haven't put the chamfer on the baffle yet as I don't have the veneer, and the back is only being held on with strap clamps, but it seems ok....

I did acoustic measurements and my MW144's performance is looking far from good. They are really smooth on a nearfield measurement up to about 1Khz, but when I measure onaxis at about 85cm they are realy bad.

I managed to do some simulation in speaker workshop and found that a second order LR crossover on the woofer at about 1Khz, with a 2nd order LR on the tweeter at about 2.2Khz + and lpad at about 4.5db cut gave something aproaching a smooth response, almost completely compensating for baffle step (probably too much so!).... but what is really bugging me is that the MW144 should be much smoother than this, and I can't work out why it has a massive dip at 2.3Khz and then lower response from about 3Khz to 5Khz.... It sort of corresponds to simulations in BDS (as far as the curve shape is concerned) but the magnitude is much greater! BDS shows a dip of about 3db at 2300Hz but I'm, getting about 12db!! also BDS only shows about 1db difference between the trough and the frequencies from 3Khz on, but I have 3db.....

The attached pic shows the woofer repsonse + tweeter response (in red).... I think based on the fact that the tweeter isn't showing big dips at 2.3K I can rule out my mic as being dodgy (though I still may try another wand...)

I've tryed lining the walls with foam, and putting in polyester stuffing, this had no effect on the dip at 2.3Khz, but did remove a nasty peak (of about 6db) at 5Khz.....

Should I beleive the results I'm seeing and design my crossover with that, or should I try and get to the bottom of why I have such a large dip???

Is it likely that this is the actual response of my drivers?? or some other factor like standing waves or baffle diffraction.

Tony.
Attached Images
File Type: gif onaxis.gif (21.1 KB, 266 views)
__________________
Any intelligence I may appear to have is purely artificial!
Some of my photos
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th September 2005, 07:31 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Italy
Hi wintermute, (sorry for my english)
Mmmhh... yust a crazy idea.....is the mounting hole of the woofer cylindrical?
Try to flare it internally.
regards
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th September 2005, 12:55 PM   #3
rabbitz is offline rabbitz  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
rabbitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Newcastle, Australia
I'm not familiar with the driver but where are you measuring.... in line with the tweeter.... between tweeter and woofer.... is the measuring distance a bit close.... only thoughts.

Maybe the dip on the woofer is the transition from the cone to the dust cap.

What's it sound like with music?

No help but just thinking out aloud.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th September 2005, 01:35 PM   #4
just another
diyAudio Moderator
 
wintermute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney
Blog Entries: 22
Hi Inertial,

I have got a flare internaly, used a 15mm chamfer bit.... but maybe the mounting hole is too tight before the flare... Your English is fine by the way

Hi Rabittz,

measuring in line with the tweeter.... distance was 87cm, tried this afternoon at about 2M and got the same result. It is an mtm and both woofers were running, but If I disconect one, same story.

I did a very makeshift crossover 1st order, just stock components for 3Khz without any impedance compensation. Some vocals sound great (Jeniffer warns) some sound crap (Nick Cave)..... reversing the tweeter polarity helps with nick cave but the measured response is awfull with a huge dip (about 20db) at both 2Khz and 20Khz... The weird thing was, that it sounds better with the mw144 running full range, no coil, than it does with the coil.

I went back and looked at some of my tests, and I tested on the baffle only no box, and had the same dip so I can rule out the box could be the baffle though.....

The graph I have seen is from morel europe and it shows it being pretty flat out to 7Khz and then drops just like my graph does at 5Khz...... me thinks they fudged it

Looks like I got more than I bargained for, this was supposed to be an easy driver for me to do a crossover for. I thought if it is flat to 7Khz the crossover will be a lot easier (since it's my first one)....

attached is a picture of the rear of the baffles.

Tony.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg baffles.jpg (47.1 KB, 196 views)
__________________
Any intelligence I may appear to have is purely artificial!
Some of my photos
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th September 2005, 02:12 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Italy
Hi wintermute,
Probabilly two factors summed. The woofer have a dip "per se", summed with a diffraction effect. Try with some felt wool (like Duntech)
on the baffle perimeter and repeat the test.
regards
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th September 2005, 02:28 PM   #6
rabbitz is offline rabbitz  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
rabbitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Quote:
Originally posted by wintermute
The weird thing was, that it sounds better with the mw144 running full range, no coil, than it does with the coil.
I usually run most of my mid woofers almost full range (driver dependant of course) and cross over to the tweeter with a 1st order series. Maybe a different crossover point. What can work extremely well is different orders on the drivers such as 1st on the woofer and 2nd on the tweeter to achieve the desired acoustic roll off.

Does the Morel graph have any little bumps or blips in the impedance plot between 2000Hz-3000Hz and is there any on your measured impedance plot? Could indicate the source of the dip is the driver.

It's all fun isn't it..... good luck with it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th September 2005, 01:35 AM   #7
just another
diyAudio Moderator
 
wintermute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney
Blog Entries: 22
Hi guys,

I had been considering using felt like duntech, and decided not to offset the drivers based on the info on their site... I bought some felt but it is too thin to have any effect, need to find some that is about 5mm thick...

The response plot I have is from eltimaudio which I think is morel's european distributor.... Morel Isreal have very limited info available on their web site. The curve has very little resemblence to my drivers, and is I think Highly suspect.... the low end goes way too low, and the high end is too extended... atached is a copy of the response plot.

It does have a dip at about 2600 or so... but I don't have anything like the response curve for my nearfield measurements, mine are much smoother...

I'm thinking if I can get rid of the 2.3K dip, I might be able to put in a wide notch filter to bring the hump between 800 and 1800 Hz down but I can play with that in sims and see how it goes

Thanks for the tips rabbitz and inertial, I'll keep at it, though I have a few other priorities I need to get out of the way first!

Let the fun begin

Tony.
Attached Images
File Type: gif responseplot.gif (48.1 KB, 171 views)
__________________
Any intelligence I may appear to have is purely artificial!
Some of my photos
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th September 2005, 01:40 AM   #8
just another
diyAudio Moderator
 
wintermute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney
Blog Entries: 22
Here is a nearfield plot, note I still have a problem with my mic, giving lots of little ripples.... need to get to the bottom of that.

Irregularities between 500Hz and about 1.5Khz are damped internal reflections or standing waves. much worse without damping material

Tony.
Attached Images
File Type: gif nearfield.gif (32.0 KB, 165 views)
__________________
Any intelligence I may appear to have is purely artificial!
Some of my photos
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th September 2005, 03:09 AM   #9
clem_o is offline clem_o  Philippines
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Manila
Hi Tony,

Not only amps, speakers too huh... :-)

Your graph looks pretty normal, doesn't seem that there are any problems with the mic. The dip looks like its caused by cone breakup, which is pretty much material-dependent. Of course there's the question as to why the manufacturer's curve doesn't look the same... well, possibly:

1. The measurements are pretty much smoothened usually, at least 1/3 octave or more.
2. The materials used on the woofer then (versus now) is a bit different. I'm not familiar with the woofer in question, but it wouldn't be surprising to find differences in material characteristic (specially if the woofer is pulp).
3. You would't be overloading the mic preamp (or mic itself) would you? (though am not sure what the effect of such would be)


MTMs are better worked with 3rd octave crossovers, if I recall properly. In this case you may have to consider using a different woofer (oops) or moving the crossover frequency down. A 2nd order LPF coupled with a 3rd order unit for the tweeter may come out better...

Cheers!
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th September 2005, 03:27 AM   #10
just another
diyAudio Moderator
 
wintermute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney
Blog Entries: 22
Hi Clem yeah I was only playing with the amp as a break from the speakers

The cone material is damped polymer composite..... I might try taking a measurement not mounted in a baffle (just sitting on the floor) and see if the dip is still there, obviously if it is then it's the speaker itself

you are correct, Joe d'appolito used 3rd order butterworth in his initial designs, but later started using 4th order linkwitz riley, when I simulated with 2nd order LR, the actual rollof was pretty much 4th order LR, so I was thinking that would probably work ok....

for the gated measurements, I don't think there is any chance of mic or preamp overload, for the nearfield measurement however, I suspsect one or other was overloading, as it is more noisy than I normally get, will have to do another one.

Tony.
__________________
Any intelligence I may appear to have is purely artificial!
Some of my photos
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
KEF 105.2 105/2 Service Data? Crossover Schematic? solderhead Multi-Way 6 7th October 2007 11:52 PM
A suspect EL34 alexmoose Tubes / Valves 2 20th July 2006 02:33 AM
help with design SPL box (subwoofer T\S data inside) Astro Power Subwoofers 3 11th January 2006 10:42 PM
Crossover Design argonrepublic Multi-Way 2 14th July 2005 05:45 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:33 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2