Passive Crossovers >> Capacitors Question - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24th August 2001, 05:44 PM   #1
Beggar is offline Beggar  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Beggar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
Lo, Im currently building my self a basic 2 way cross over for my car, comprimising of 1 inductor and what was going to be 1 capacitor, however I cant get the capacitor required. I was thinking about wiring several caps in parrallel to add up to the correct capactiance, but I dont know if this will filter frequencies properly, my logic says no, but my logic's also carp, so if anyone knows help would be appreciated.
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2001, 05:50 PM   #2
Freddie is offline Freddie  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Sweden
Of course you can put several capacitors in parallel to get the value you want. For example two 10uF 50V caps in parallel will make a 20uF 50V cap. And two 10uF 50V in series will make a 5uF 100V cap.

/Freddie
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2001, 06:38 PM   #3
Beggar is offline Beggar  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Beggar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
I dont think i made myself clear in my first post, I know about capactiance i.e. in parrallel C+C=CT and series 1/C+1/C=1/CT, ill explain how my logic's working right now. When a capacitor has AC thru it i.e. a music signal passing through it, it has a reactance, reactance is the same as resistance only it varies with freqency of the AC/signal, with a capacitor the higher the frequency the lower the reactance/resistance, so *in an AC circuit when a capacitor is acting as a filter it is in effect a resistor*. When these are in series and parrallel they behave in the complete opposite way to 'capacitors'

*This is the bit im not sure of*

Sorry about not being clear
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2001, 10:35 PM   #4
HDTVman is offline HDTVman  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Chicago area
Beggar

Sorry about the problem you are having with your logic. The formula is Z=1/2*3.14159*F*C. Z = impeadance F = Frequency and C = capacitance. By using this formula we can find that increasing the value of C will lower the value of Z at a frequency of F, OR increasing the value of C will lower the frequency F for a give value of Z.

All this means is, Freddie is right. Using caps in parrallel to get a larger value or some special value works just fine.

Good luck
__________________
What ever makes the tunes flow
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2001, 10:40 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Orleans, France
Default capacitors in parallel

Dont think twice, its all right :

You can obtain any value of capacitance by wiring several capacitors in parallel, simply adding individual values.

Regards, P.Lacombe
  Reply With Quote
Old 24th August 2001, 11:00 PM   #6
Beggar is offline Beggar  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Beggar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
Thanks everyone, nice to see im wrong as usual (it is actually nice as it saves me time and money!). I just found a book that had why caps filter and stuff and now i can see i was being a prune, and have adjusted my logic accordingly
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2005, 02:19 AM   #7
okkyn is offline okkyn  Singapore
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bukit Panjang
Why sometimes there are 2 capacitors in parallel, one with bigger value (usualy electrolitic) and one smaller (usualy film)? I found this configuration alot as a coupling caps. Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2005, 03:20 AM   #8
simon5 is offline simon5  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Québec, Québec
The smaller cap is "faster", less parasitic resistance, less parasitic inductance, so it can discharge and recharge faster.

So the small cap start acting faster, then after a few nanoseconds, the bigger cap wake up and start working before the smaller cap is drained up.

That's more complicated in reality, but you can see it that way to make things more simple.
__________________
DIYaudio for President !
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
passive crossovers.... stuman Subwoofers 10 8th December 2009 02:44 AM
Can I use polarized capacitors in passive crossovers? sardonx Multi-Way 7 8th April 2006 11:37 AM
bi-amping through passive crossovers ultrachrome Multi-Way 4 31st March 2005 01:14 AM
dB loss by using passive crossovers? Active vs Passive and 1st vs 4th order Hybrid fourdoor Multi-Way 3 11th July 2004 09:16 PM
Solder for passive crossovers. JoeBob Multi-Way 8 31st December 2001 04:28 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:56 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2