Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 31st August 2005, 02:15 PM   #1
Sony is offline Sony  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Question Crossover topology for 3.5 way

I am somehow lost, therefore decide to ask the help of the experienced members.
It's hard to control all the factors, like time and phase alignment. At this point I just want to save time and money and go for a safe solution that will probably work well and does not require hard tuning.

The project:

3.5 Way floorstanding
xo points (2nd order):
- Tweeter: 4KHz- (5KHz- if 1st order)
- Midrange: 1-4KHz (2-5KHz if 1st order)
- Woofer 1: 0-1KHz (vented)
- Woofer 2: 0-200Hz (vented)

I haven't tried these yet:
- 12dB paralell Linkwitz-Riley
- 12dB paralell Butterworth
- 1st order paralell or series
- Mixed orders

From these, what do you believe would be the most likely to "fit and work well" topology?

Thks & rgrds
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st August 2005, 05:11 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
leadbelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Well, IMHO, you are lost because you are barking up the wrong tree.
Wanting to avoid hand tuning is a worthy objective, but then to combine this with an objective of a 3.5 way passive crossover (!) is begging for disappointment. Maybe you could back up a bit and tell us what your skills and project goals and budget are and we could suggest an alternative route.
BTW, even if you are stubborn and insist on going this route nobody can help you because you haven't specified drivers or driver parameters.
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st September 2005, 12:48 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
David Gatti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Sony, it's a very complex answer to your question.
Have a read of my website for some ideas.

http://www.gattiweb.com/delta_design.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st September 2005, 01:06 AM   #4
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Australia
The project:

3.5 Way floorstanding
xo points (2nd order):
- Tweeter: 4KHz- (5KHz- if 1st order)
- Midrange: 1-4KHz (2-5KHz if 1st order)
- Woofer 1: 0-1KHz (vented)
- Woofer 2: 0-200Hz (vented)

i think your system is not 3.5 i think it is 4way pseudo
make it 4way make a crossover at 200hz 4way sounds better than
3.5 keep the system in good order

this suggestion is super
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st September 2005, 10:41 AM   #5
Sony is offline Sony  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
Thanks for the tips.

Concerning the 3.5 vs. 4 way, since the last frequency xo is very low (200Hz), I thought it would be best to avoid the complexity of a second band pass (on the woofer), and play with the enclosure/port tuning making its freq. response start a slow drop at 200Hz.
With a large chamber the woofer handling a 0-1000Hz signal results in a 100-1000Hz response, with a gentle natural drop starting at 200Hz.

The other woofer (0-200) uses a separate chamber with a pipe-horn about 1.5 meters long. Response is about 18Hz (-6dB).

I have found excelent software for enclosure design but the only crossover design software I've found were calculation sheets for the classic crossover types.

Drivers are:

1 x LCY 130 (well known by diyaudio members)
1 x Beyma MC115
2 x Beyma 8Woofer-P
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st September 2005, 10:59 AM   #6
jomor is offline jomor  Greece
diyAudio Member
 
jomor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Athens
Quote:
Originally posted by Sony
[I have found excelent software for enclosure design but the only crossover design software I've found were calculation sheets for the classic crossover types.
calculation sheets are far from reality. you have to be lucky to make a 2 way to work properly (smooth magnitute transition at the x frequency, less than 10 degrees phase difference around the x frequency). In fact thats not that easy even when measuring and simulating. Its almost impossible to make this happen with calculators on a 3.5 ways, you need to measure and simulate and to spend too much time for fine tuning. A 3.5 way is not a plug and play project, in needs lots of developing time, if you dont have the appropriate tools and experience, it would be wiser to go for something more simple, which will please you sooner. Good luck anyway
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UcD like topology amp. Bender.ru Class D 232 21st March 2012 03:55 AM
Anyone seen this amp topology before? BlackUnikorn Tubes / Valves 14 6th August 2008 08:51 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:51 PM.

Page generated in 0.08850 seconds (79.71% PHP - 20.29% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio