|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
|
I am somehow lost, therefore decide to ask the help of the experienced members.
It's hard to control all the factors, like time and phase alignment. At this point I just want to save time and money and go for a safe solution that will probably work well and does not require hard tuning. The project: 3.5 Way floorstanding xo points (2nd order): - Tweeter: 4KHz- (5KHz- if 1st order) - Midrange: 1-4KHz (2-5KHz if 1st order) - Woofer 1: 0-1KHz (vented) - Woofer 2: 0-200Hz (vented) I haven't tried these yet: - 12dB paralell Linkwitz-Riley - 12dB paralell Butterworth - 1st order paralell or series - Mixed orders From these, what do you believe would be the most likely to "fit and work well" topology? Thks & rgrds |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Well, IMHO, you are lost because you are barking up the wrong tree.
Wanting to avoid hand tuning is a worthy objective, but then to combine this with an objective of a 3.5 way passive crossover (!) is begging for disappointment. Maybe you could back up a bit and tell us what your skills and project goals and budget are and we could suggest an alternative route. BTW, even if you are stubborn and insist on going this route nobody can help you because you haven't specified drivers or driver parameters.
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Sony, it's a very complex answer to your question.
Have a read of my website for some ideas. http://www.gattiweb.com/delta_design.html |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Australia
|
The project:
3.5 Way floorstanding xo points (2nd order): - Tweeter: 4KHz- (5KHz- if 1st order) - Midrange: 1-4KHz (2-5KHz if 1st order) - Woofer 1: 0-1KHz (vented) - Woofer 2: 0-200Hz (vented) i think your system is not 3.5 i think it is 4way pseudo make it 4way make a crossover at 200hz 4way sounds better than 3.5 keep the system in good order this suggestion is super |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Europe
|
Thanks for the tips.
Concerning the 3.5 vs. 4 way, since the last frequency xo is very low (200Hz), I thought it would be best to avoid the complexity of a second band pass (on the woofer), and play with the enclosure/port tuning making its freq. response start a slow drop at 200Hz. With a large chamber the woofer handling a 0-1000Hz signal results in a 100-1000Hz response, with a gentle natural drop starting at 200Hz. The other woofer (0-200) uses a separate chamber with a pipe-horn about 1.5 meters long. Response is about 18Hz (-6dB). I have found excelent software for enclosure design but the only crossover design software I've found were calculation sheets for the classic crossover types. Drivers are: 1 x LCY 130 (well known by diyaudio members) 1 x Beyma MC115 2 x Beyma 8Woofer-P |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Athens
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| UcD like topology amp. | Bender.ru | Class D | 232 | 21st March 2012 03:55 AM |
| Anyone seen this amp topology before? | BlackUnikorn | Tubes / Valves | 14 | 6th August 2008 08:51 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08850 seconds (79.71% PHP - 20.29% MySQL) with 10 queries |