|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mexico City
|
Hello all!
I've been playing around with my new speakers for a while (first ones, too!) The design is mine. It's an MTM with Focal 5N421 woofers and the Neo3 PDR tweeter. The crossover is a standard 3rd order Butterworth at 3KHz, and the woofers are wired in series with impedance EQ. BSC is provided by an inductor wired in parallel with a resistor. I didn't need to use an L-Pad on the tweeter. The speakers were supposed to have a 4" port, but due to size constraints (and the internal reinforcements), I had to abandon the idea. There was no way I could stick a port that large inside the enclosure. So, what I did was leave a 4" hole (2" MDF thick) and work the crossover into that space. I listened to the speakers with the port unplugged, and tuned the crossover that way. When I arrived to what I considered was a good sounding speaker, I sealed the port and put the crossover in place. Now the balance was completely wrong! The speakers had zero bass now, and lots of treble. I tried playing around with the BSC resistor, but all I managed was to shift the balance towards dull and warm. After thinking about it (and using the wonderful Woofer Tester!), I checked out the system Qts. It's close to 0.29. I think that's far too low. My questions are... Considering Qts, would you rather use a smaller vent (say, 2"), and go vented again? If I do, do I need to remove damping (apparently, I need to. I used polyfill and foam on the walls). Since Qts is so low, should I tune the speakers a bit high to restore some of the lost midbass? I think that when I tested my speakers with the port unblocked, they were tuned at around 70-80 Hz. I'd try tuning them this time around 40 Hz. Does this sound right? I think tuning them lower wouldn't get me enough of a midbass boost. Last... is there anyway to at least keep some of that wonderful sealed bass sound? Even though they are light on the bass and midbass, I just listened to the Superbass Telarc SACD, and I swear I had never listened to such amazing lows. Taut, defined, very fast... unfortunately, not very balanced. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ported & sealed 2-in-1 subwoofer...possible? | rocko1290 | Subwoofers | 11 | 11th September 2006 02:53 AM |
| sealed vs. ported | sonu | Multi-Way | 25 | 9th May 2005 12:50 PM |
| Sealed or ported? | mazeroth | Subwoofers | 13 | 23rd November 2004 12:44 PM |
| ¿Sealed or Ported? | eXn | Car Audio | 28 | 11th October 2004 11:05 PM |
| DPL12: Sealed or ported? | needtubes | Multi-Way | 4 | 1st July 2004 12:42 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06716 seconds (71.95% PHP - 28.05% MySQL) with 10 queries |