|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Amsterdam
|
I don't know if this is the right forum for this message. It could also be in a tube vs transistor topic or whatever, but afterall it's about loudspeakers so I'll just post it here.
Today I have made some tweeter measurements on a couple of old type ESS AMT transformers (the small ones on a round baffle) I did some frequency and impulse response measurements on them using two different amplifiers. One was a Hiraga 20W class A transistor push pull amp, the other one was a 300B single ended triode amp (mu-stage driven) As you can see there is almost absolutly no difference in the frequency response measurements (one is scaled for better view) but the impulse response show a big difference. The green line is the one with the Hiraga amp the red one with the 300B amp (notice that this one is out of phase) The transistor amp seems to have a much faster rise time but also has some more "ringing", draw your own conclusions here. I haven't done a extensive listening test to actually hear the difference, gonna do that soon. so here's the measured impulse response |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Amsterdam
|
And the measured frequency response.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Earth
|
I'm not sure they are so different other than the reversed polarity. If you turn the 300B up so the volume is the same, and the amplitude of the big impulse spike is the same, I'll bet the "ringing" looks similar too.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Amsterdam
|
they actually are measured at the same volume, the red curve is only scaled down for better visabilty.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clifton Park, NY
|
One amp appears to be inverting the input signal. If you multiply one of the impulse responses by -1, and scale the first peaks to be the same magnitude for both traces, I would guess that the impulse responses would look much closer to being the same.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
I don't know how your system works, but the two I've used ratio the raw SPL spectrum against the applied voltage spectrum, which takes the amp frequency response out of the picture.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Amsterdam
|
Guess you guys are right. I scaled the frequency response back and know the impulse response looks almost identical. I made a mistake by first scaling the frequency response before comparing the impulse responses, stupid stupid stupid, please excuse me.
Anyway, I'm gonna be listening to the difference this week to see (hear) what's comes out. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HOLMImpulse: Measuring Frequency- & Impulse-Response | askbojesen | Software Tools | 759 | 20th November 2011 05:42 PM |
| Loudspeaker impulse response optimization | thadman | Multi-Way | 7 | 18th April 2009 04:42 PM |
| Direct Impulse Response measurements | jzagaja | Multi-Way | 33 | 4th October 2007 11:33 AM |
| impulse response vs. enclosure size | East | Subwoofers | 5 | 23rd February 2006 12:53 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08938 seconds (75.04% PHP - 24.96% MySQL) with 11 queries |