A how to for a PC XO.
I see that there is a little interest in using a PC as a fully fledged and highly configurable crossover so I thought I'd make a thread to save repeating information that is already scattered throughout various threads on here.
Don't mistake this method with the inferior Foobar/Winamp method. This route allows you to connect external sources to the PC, watch video and DVD's, play games and so forth. It is in essence a self contained XO box which will filter any audio signal be it analogue or digital. Its real benefits lie with digital audio though and users of Vinyl and Tape would be better served I suspect by sticking to more traditional methods.
It functions just like any other standalone XO such as the DEQX, DCX etc. Plug in what you want filtered and it does the rest.
First off I'll highlight the disadvantages and then you can make a decision as to whether is actually worth reading the rest of this thread.
Right here's the cons:
If your still reading then the pluses are going to really interest you:
Please don't reply to this thread just yet since I'll continue the discussion on another post. This way it doesn't seperate the information - Thanks
Right, I'll list the most basic components required to create a stereo 3-way XO. I'll elaborate on my configuration for multichannel just after but I think this would be best to keep things from getting overly intimidating and complicated.
As always its a case of bigger is better regarding the CPU, the more power the more plugins you can run and the lower the latency or delay of the signal.
Also remember that you really need a dedicated PC to do DVD, HiDef video, multichannel audio or gaming otherwise you'll start getting dropouts on the audio and other strange artifacts.
I use the following for the dedicated XO PC:
Thats really all you need, you don't need much hard drive space since all the PC does it filter audio. You also don't need any graphics power since it doesn't do anything but display the Windows desktop.
What you do need is plenty of memory, a good stable motherboard with a minimum of data transfer bottleneck potential and the quickest CPU you can afford.
Also remember that you can use any components in their, I just listed what works well for me. Keep in mind that you want it quiet or better silent so add things like quite fans, sound proofing or passive cooling and a fanless PSU.
Soundcard and accessories
I use an RME HDSP 9632 in the dedicated XO PC.
Its a pro-level card that supports all the features we need. If your looking for something different then make sure it supports the following:
I can guarantee the RME supports both of these but anything else would be a guess and the operation of various details will obviously change depending on the card drivers etc.
The RME offers a few features that aren't essential but are nice all the same:
[list][*] 192Khz 24bit DAC's with an SNR of 110dB[*] DSP based 40bit precision volume controls for all digital volumes means less bits lost when attenuating signals.[*] Low latency and zero CPU load technologies
One thing I am dissapointed with though is the clocking on the RME - its OK by soundcard standards in its price range but pretty rough compared to what we would ideally like. I bought an Antelope Isochrone OCX master clock to combat this problem - it works great but isn't essential in the way that the whole thing won't work without it.
I almost forgot, the RME only has 2 analogue outputs in standard configuration, clearly not enough for a stereo 3-way which requires 6 channels. Fear not though because you add in expansion boards to flesh out the number of outputs. Depending on your requirements you can have a maximum of 14 analogue outs and 14 analogue in's.
If you want to maintain 192Khz 24bit capability then use the best DAC expansion board, the 4 channel AO4S-192:
Adding this will upgade you to a total of 6 outputs that are 192Khz 24bit capable and have the same 110dB SNR that the two outputs on the soundcard have. Should you require even more channels then you can add the 8 channel AEB 8 Out on top of the AO4S-192. This brings the total number of outputs to 14 and is what I use. Bear in mind though that AEB 8 Out doesn't do 24bit 192Khz and has a lower SNR. So you definitely want to take the AO4S-192 over that one to start with.
You can also add inputs in a similar fashion but using the equivalent input boards to the ones listed above. On top of this you can add things like Wordclock modules (needed if you use an external clock such as the Antelope).
Here's what you need for the software side of things:
PS. Make sure your running the latest RME drivers also.
This is the very heart of the system, its a plugin client that allows you to pass audio signal routed from the RME through various plugins which process the signal and then after this the processed signal can be routed to the outputs on the RME ready to be sent onto your amplifiers and finally the speakers themselves.
It supports ASIO, DirectX and VST plugins or 90% of what's available now.
Its also easy to use with an intuative drag and drop scheme for routing signal to various plugin components, this also provides a good visual reference of what is going where. A quick pic to show it working:
And a shot of it running:
You can download a free 30-day trial from here as well as view the features:
This next bit will be all about the plugins you need to actually get the whole thing to behave like a crossover.
First up is Waves Linear Phase EQ, an FIR filter. This is actually a very well respected studio grade piece of software used in mastering, so that obviously inspires confidence in the level of performance.
This plugin actually creates the XO slopes and can easily create any order of rolloff based on Q and combining filters. Like I said in the advantages bit at the start of this thread, you can create perfectly symetrical acoustic slopes either side of the XO point by simplying playing with the values in the plugin and measuring the resulting response with the Real Time Analyser until you get acoustic 4th order or whatever.
Its also entirely possible to add in notch filters at this stage to tame breakup resonances in metal cones or an all pass to erridicate a rising response or baffle step.
Its easy to use because the output is visual and in combination with a PC based RTA you've got the ability to measure and adjust on the fly within seconds to get your perfect response, if its not right go back into Waves LineEQ adjust and re-measure until your happy. Powerful stuff indeed!
Finally the pricing on the Waves stuff is steep and there's no demo available.
I'll mention this here since its related to the filters. If you don't want to use FIR filters you can use the Waves C4 plugin that offers IIR filters, its not as flexible though since you can't add all pass or notch filters easily.
Voxengo Curve EQ
This is used for the Digital Room Correction component of the system and is again an FIR linear phase based EQ.
You can also download a demo from the above link but the audio periodically drops out to encourage you to buy the real thing.
Its level of required scope in the context of our application is quite limited compared to its true capabilities so much of what it offers is left untouched and turned off.
But what it does for us is very competant despite a lot of wasted features. Plug your mic into the soundcard, then run a frequency sweep from 20hz - 20Khz and watch it draw your rooms response. Hit a button in CurveEQ and that same response is turn into an inverse of its original ready to be applied to the signal.
The up shot of this is that room interactions on frequency response are virtually eliminated.
DRC isn't and shouldn't be applied until after you've got sorted XO filter - don't try to fudge mistakes with Curve EQ.
Just to be clear let me detail the process I recommend:
First off just play with the XO points and slopes, try to get something that sounds best to you. Then after your satisfied, fine tune the whole thing like so:
PS. When I mention 'measurements' below I'm refering to using a RTA in conjunction with a sinewave generator and/or Speaker Workshop for phase etc.
Then bring the speakers inside and correctly set them up in your listening room.
The benefit of this method is that you can swap rooms or positions for the speakers and know that anechoically they are flat in response. All you need to do is run the DRC again to compensate for the room.
Another method would be get a flat response just using the XO filters but swap rooms or positions and you've got a hell of a lot of setting up to do again. This method just allows you to do the DRC which is very quick ie. <5mins.
Voxengo Sample Delay
This is a simple way of phase correction.
Self explanatory stuff, adjust dials phase changes, simple as. The bonus is that this one free just download it from the link above.
Now there's also another method that yeilds greater control over phase by allowing frequency specific delays. But the results are virtually inaudible for my speaker project and requires lots of work and measurements with Speaker Workshop ie. very time consuming, actually very very time consuming!
There's a couple more bits I'd like to talk about regarding software such as the RTA software and sinewave generator that are essential to aid proper setup. But I've spent a good couple of hours on this already so I'll leave it for today and continue tommorow if I have time.
I'll also provide a more thorough explanation of the exact options and setting to use in the software and RME drivers for proper operation and best performance.
Feel free to ask questions in the mean time though since I don't expect that to be up for a while.
just awesome... just awesome
about this ....
can that program be used from any cards or is it RME specific??
also does it always "work" in the backgroud? meaning if I'm watchign a movie it will still have the xover and such??
I did it mainly because you wouldn't stop asking :D
Also bear in mind though noob, that you need a card that can support at least 6 analogue outs and preferably double that for future expansion, for example a 5.1 system with 3-way fronts and the rest with self contained XO's that are of no concern to the PC XO then your looking at 10 outputs needed. Or to break it down: 6 for the fronts, 2 for the surround, 1 for center and 1 for the sub.
Remember though that even though its only the fronts that have XO duties performed by the PC in this configuration you still have full control over delays and more importantly the DRC can be applied to each of those channels also.
I actually use DRC for each individual speaker and each with its own tailored DRC response for its position relative to the listening spot, rather than a generic response spread over all the speakers. Tailoring it to each speaker this way brings even more improvements.
Like I said earlier, multichannel is awesome on this setup.
Regarding your other question: Console will run in the background at all times and perform XO duties regardless of what your doing. Remember that you'll need to have light tasks for it such as 2 channel audio for it to work flawlessly if you use an all in one solution. I can't stress that enough because if you start playing DVD and especially high definition video and games you will start to hear all manner of stranger noises from the speakers that could actually potentially damage the HF drivers. Those strange noises are things like pop's, stuttering, cracking, hiss etc.
I'd say stick with the 2 channel only if you want DRC and a 3-way XO all on one PC regardkess of power - my main rig is an Athlon 4000+ and it can't handle it, which shocked me as I went in with the attitude that I'd be fine. The setup I have now with dedicated rig hasn't glitched once and why should it since its sole purpose is to process the audio.
Very interesting. Thanks for laying this all out.
Can you provide a diagram that shows how your sources are interfaced? Having DVDs and CDs on a computer is fine but how are you connnecting analog sources?
Also, how is CPU utilization on your XO box? What components seem to use up the most?
I don't want to confuse people because the way I've got mine setup is quite complicated spread out over two PC's. It doesn't need to be that complicated because a lot of the complexity I have is due to extra niceties.
I can state that for analogue sources, you simply connect them to the dedicated XO's analogue in's and its all automatically processed the way I've got mine setup. For example I've got a digital TV box that's just plugged into the XO PC and when its turned on the sound is processed regardless of if the main PC is sending digital audio also - it doesn't sound good playing two sources at the same time though :D
Wait a few days and all will be revealed. Afterall there's still a fair amount that I haven't said, so please bear with me.
Likewise with the CPU resources needed - Console actually provides such a monitor to keep an eye on things. With the dedicated box I use around 15-20% for stereo and around 65% for multichannel using FIR filters. Again I'll post shots when I continue the rest of it.
ShinOBIWAN: Thanks for the information. It comes at a very good time for me. I've just started to do a PC crossover using the KX drivers and an old Soundblaster Live! 5.1 Value soundcard.
As I understand it, the KX crossovers are IIR. There was some discussion on the KX forum about FIR filters, but it seemed that it could not be implemented.
I'm running a Pentium II 350Mhz computer with 384Mb ram and getting ~15% CPU usage while playing a CD and a 3-way crossover in KX.
I'm at work, but have some questions for you later about Console.
really great info
what about the MAudio 1010 .... 32 channels of outputs... external DAC and such... I just can get it slightly cheaper than the RME
either way thanks for the info
No probs, hope others will see the light of this type of setup since its superior to anything I've heard in my system before.
From a pure SQ perspective, folks in the HTPC forum on AVS have put the RME up against cards like the Delta and Lynx TWO B. From the results it was ranked Lynx top closely followed by the RME and the Delta was a fair way back from the Lynx.
Also the Delta supports 32 outputs but how many analogue outs does it have as standard? What expansion boards are available? How many of those 32 outputs can actually be used for analogue? The RME claims 32 outputs but only 16 of those can be used for analogue with a single card and as standard it comes with 2! If you need more than that with the RME you have to add a second card into the PC and link it to the first - you can add upto 3 x RME HDSP 9632's into one PC for upto 48 analogue outs if the need took you.
All these questions need answering if you choose another card and the answers largely depend upon what you expect from the system. If you want 2 channel 3-way then 6 is enough, if you want 2 channel 4-way then 8 and at the other end of the scale, if you needed enough ouputs for a 3-way 5.1 multichannel system then you'd need 16 outputs along with a dual processor dedicated PC for the sheer huge number crunching task!
Don't forget that the card also MUST have internal routing and multiclient drivers.
The only soundcard related questions I can answer with certainty are those regarding either the RME HDSP 9632 or the HDSP 9652 since I own both of these. Anything else would be a guess and at the prices these cost you wouldn't respect me for guessing!
Hopefully others will add definite working examples here also as I have done and hopefully some cheaper configurations that still allow the same core plugins and software to be used - please folks no talk of foobar or winamp stuff since that's very much restricted in flexibility and performance. What we need is people to test it on other soundcards and then report back here with the results. This will help everyone I feel.
Also Noob, you've probably noticed that the software and plugins alone come to around $2000 or more. Do you have an email address?
|All times are GMT. The time now is 01:05 PM.|
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio