|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Florida, USA
|
Just purchased a Titanic 12 MKII off E-bay brand new from Parts Express for $109.95. They auction some every week, saved me $40. Now the great old question ported or sealed. Any one here using one of these and in what size enclosure?
Chad |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
A friend of mine recently built a titanic 10" in about a 1-1.5cu. ft. sealed enclosure. He is not happy with his at all. I would suggest porting yours to get the most out of it.
Another option is a linkwitz transform in a sealed enclosure. I don't have any experience with this, but I've heard some pretty good things. You may be able to get the bottom octave in a sealed enclosure this way. Throw some numbers into a speaker design program and compare the response curves. That will give you a rough idea of what you'll get. If you are using for alot of home theater, try to make it roll off in the 20's, for mostly music you can get away with rolling off in the lower 30's. Good Luck! Austin |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia USA
|
Did some design work for a small sub with this driver and it looks very nice for a 2 ft^3 ported design: 3 inch diameter, 17 inches long. F3 in the low 20s and a smooth rolloff that should match with typical room gain.
My only concern was the air speed was high with a port of that size - but any bigger and the length becomes impractical. Thanks for the Ebay tip. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
if you get a flared port you can effectively cut down the length of the port. I would recommend a bigger box than 2 cu. ft. though. If you paid for a nice sub like the titanic, you might as well go for a big box. I'd recommend 3 cu. ft. for a good sub for both music and movies.
My 12" sub is in a 5 cu. ft. box and I wish it had a little more around 50-60Hz. I think it would if it was in a 3-4 cu. ft. box. I'm running a shiva, which is fairly similar to the titanic. Hope this helps, Austin |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Who has experience for Dayton titanic MKII subwoofer? | okk | Subwoofers | 18 | 23rd April 2010 01:54 AM |
| FS-Titanic 12" MIII sub, new, never mounted | gengis | Swap Meet | 4 | 23rd October 2007 03:48 PM |
| Titanic Sub 12" MKiii | gengis | Swap Meet | 5 | 24th November 2006 02:34 PM |
| Titanic MkIII 15" | Wingfeather | Subwoofers | 10 | 8th November 2004 06:36 AM |
| DPL12 alias Titanic MKII? | amt | Multi-Way | 10 | 19th November 2003 06:27 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11210 seconds (100.00% PHP - 0% MySQL) with 9 queries |