|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
I have a Sony AV-Receiver (about 100 watts per channel). It is hooked up to a Niles speaker selector. My main speakers are Boston Acoustics A100s. There are two add'l pair of Satellite speakers in other rooms (which have their own attenuators). All are 8 ohms (I think). The A100s are much louder than the other speakers so I'd like to use either a potentiometer or fixed resistor (which I'll switch on or off) to lower the volume of the A100s when I'm using multiple speakers. Can anyone help me figure out how to do this?
I'm not sure how many dbs I need to attenuate. Subjectively, the volume on the main speakers is moderately too loud, not blasting (I'd probably want to drop it by 30-50%. Sorry if I'm lacking enough of the technical details. I'm looking for a quick and easy fix as I won't be using it in this mode all that often. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Should I have posted this to a different forum?
Suggestions? |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bungawalbyn, NSW
|
You're going to need large high power aluminium cased resistors mounted on heatsinks to persue this approach. However, if your A100's are nominally 8 ohms, connect a 25watt 8.2 ohm resistor across the speaker terminals (parallel), and a 50watt 3.9 ohm resistor in one of the connecting wires (series). This will maintain 8 ohms for your amp, but attenuate S.P.L. by 6dB (half the volume).
The resistors will have some inductance which will probably attenuate the treble output and make your speakers sound dull, which is why you'de be better off running a seperate amp for your main speakers, with a seperate volume control. Don't underestimate the cost of high power resistors. Maybe someone could suggest a better approach? |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Thanks.
It is obviously not worth doing it the way I thought. I'll probably either by an impedence-matching attenuator or live with it the way it is! |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bungawalbyn, NSW
|
An circuit I described is an impedance matching attenuator.
Normally the variable types you can buy commercially are usually used to attenuate the more sensitive tweeter in multi way loudspeakers, to maintain 8 ohms for the crossover. There is substantially less power being fed to the tweeter than the woofer but you wish to attenuate the whole signal. I believe that high power models are available, but your talking big bucks. A second amp may work out cheaper! |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Simple Volume Attenuator IC Advice Needed | Ultima Thule | Parts | 25 | 13th October 2006 03:43 PM |
| Passive balanced volume control using a single attenuator? Possible? | ewildgoose | Solid State | 17 | 5th September 2004 10:58 PM |
| FS: relay volume control attenuator boards | jwb | Swap Meet | 5 | 30th December 2003 06:24 PM |
| Volume Control via logrithmic stepped attenuator | PaulHilgeman | Solid State | 4 | 6th February 2003 12:51 PM |
| Gainclome Volume Control using Log Stepped Attenuator | PaulHilgeman | Parts | 10 | 5th February 2003 09:40 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08490 seconds (76.79% PHP - 23.21% MySQL) with 10 queries |