Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th July 2005, 12:03 PM   #1
piro is offline piro  Israel
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tel aviv
Default Question about baffle placement and box volume

Hi
I'm in the midst of building my very first speaker system, and I'm not quite sure about the enclosure.

I'm mainly uncertain about whether should the baffle be on the outside or on the inside, or in other words, should the baffle dimentions be the actual HxW or larger on each side by twice the thickness of the MDF?

Is there any general acceptation as to how it's best to construct the enclosure in that aspect? Which sides are to be in, out or on top of which?

And lastly, would sinking the entire baffle (about 0.7 cm), affect or distort the response?

TIA,
Jonathan

EDIT CONCERNING BOX VOLUME:
My drivers are SEAS 27TDFC (http://seas.no/seas_line/tweeters/H1189.pdf) and
L18RNX/P (http://seas.no/seas_line/woofers/H1224.pdf). According to my caculations the Volume is to be 10.8 Liters, and this, taking the drivers' diameters into account, calls for a 25x43x11(cm) box. Are my calculations correct? could it be such a small box?

Jonathan
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2005, 08:17 PM   #2
piro is offline piro  Israel
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tel aviv
Another thing I've been meaning to ask (although I'm sure it will show me for the newbie that I am): inductors, as I know them, are large gauged copper wire things. Yet what I was given when I went to buy some for my original design of crossover were tiny objects, very much like small resistors, marked with that color code. Am I missing something here? could it be due to the values of those inductors (0.5mH and 2mH)?

thanks,
Jonathan
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2005, 09:39 PM   #3
simon5 is offline simon5  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Québec, Québec
You probably got iron core inductors instead of air core inductors.

Iron core are much smaller, but you don't want iron core in audio, except for a subwoofer.
__________________
DIYaudio for President !
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th July 2005, 09:43 PM   #4
simon5 is offline simon5  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Québec, Québec
Quote:
And lastly, would sinking the entire baffle (about 0.7 cm), affect or distort the response?
Yes, not recommended. The baffle should be flat.
__________________
DIYaudio for President !
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2005, 11:04 AM   #5
piro is offline piro  Israel
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tel aviv
O.k thanks. I was getting worried about those inductors.
Any clue about the volume of the box?
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2005, 11:56 AM   #6
just another
diyAudio Moderator
 
wintermute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney
Blog Entries: 22
Just use simple math W X D X H = volume of the box... this should be the internal dimentions. Rule of thumb is to add 10% to the volume to allow for displacement of drivers, bracing etc.

so once you have the internal dimentions just work out which way you are going to join your cabinet sides, top, bottom back and baffle, and add the necessary amount for the thickness of your MDF. Do a drawing it will help

Tony.
__________________
Any intelligence I may appear to have is purely artificial!
Some of my photos
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2005, 12:42 PM   #7
piro is offline piro  Israel
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tel aviv
Yes, as I have said, I alredy have the dimentions of the box. My question was whether these dimentions appeaer reasonable considering the drivers' parameters.
And I gather there are is no general consensus as to the the way the box should be constructed?

Jonathan.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2005, 01:24 PM   #8
just another
diyAudio Moderator
 
wintermute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney
Blog Entries: 22
Sorry Piro I misinterpreted your first post, probably should go to bed I had a late night last night, and going back and re-reading your first post it shows

With respect to how to do the baffle (and a completely non scientific approach), probably whatever way you find easiest to get it to seal well how accurately you can cut your MDF will influence this the most.

Tony.
__________________
Any intelligence I may appear to have is purely artificial!
Some of my photos
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2005, 02:46 PM   #9
piro is offline piro  Israel
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tel aviv
Okay.
How about the drivers' locations? (their distance from each other and from the edges of the baffle).
Also, I've determined the width of the baffle as 5cm more than the width (diameter) of the woofer. Again, is this o.k or is there special importance to the baffle's dimensions?

thanks again,
Jonathan
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st July 2005, 11:35 PM   #10
just another
diyAudio Moderator
 
wintermute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney
Blog Entries: 22
Quote:
Originally posted by piro
Okay.
How about the drivers' locations? (their distance from each other and from the edges of the baffle).
summary put the drivers as close to each other as possible, and try to mount them a little off center (both height and width wise) for more info check out this recent thread Driver Alignment

Quote:


Also, I've determined the width of the baffle as 5cm more than the width (diameter) of the woofer. Again, is this o.k or is there special importance to the baffle's dimensions?

thanks again,
Jonathan
baffle width will determine at what freq baffle step (do a search lots of info in here) starts to happen at, also the width is (supposed) to effect the imaging with narrower widths supposed to image better. There are differing oppinions on this last point. I think that the above thread has mention of the edge and the baffle diffraction simulator in it both of which can be used to simulate baffle step, and the BDS being able to simulate difraction effects as well..

Tony.

edit: the edge wasn't linked, here it is http://www.tolvan.com/edge/

edit2: oh and one other thing, you shouldn't have any of your dimentions (W D H) the same, or it will tend to cause problems with standing waves.
__________________
Any intelligence I may appear to have is purely artificial!
Some of my photos
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Driver Placement on baffle 56oval Multi-Way 2 26th July 2009 05:25 PM
have a placement question Jonny Hotnuts Car Audio 5 20th December 2007 11:57 PM
Driver placement on baffle - advice needed TheoM Multi-Way 3 16th September 2005 07:28 PM
Question on port placement??? Javaman Multi-Way 0 16th October 2003 01:34 PM
driver placement on front baffle griff Multi-Way 3 5th April 2002 10:51 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:49 PM.

Page generated in 0.10985 seconds (82.46% PHP - 17.54% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio