|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
|
I've just finished building Troel's Acapella SE
http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/diy_lou...pella%20SE.pdf Initially, there is quite a bit of mid-bass hum (or resonance) which makes double-bass and male voice sound kind of boomy. So I decided to put some stuffings right behind the driver and it helps a bit. There is still some left but it is much better now. On some recordings, this is not a problem but on some other recordings, I can feel it is very bothering. My other problem is that the bass is a little lacking. I have to turn the volume all the way up to get deep and strong bass. The bass driver is an Seas 8in . The cabinet volume is about 42 liters. Is there any way I can boost the bass? My room is 14 x 20 feet. Can an 8in driver provide bass for this room size? the bass is a third order low pass that has no attenuation. Also, I am suspecting the bass hum is due to internal standing wave. Do you know of a way to brace the cabinet to get rid of internal standing wave? I don't think my cabinet flex. I don't have any measurement equipment but when I place my ears right next to the cabinet walls (don't laugh), I really don't hear any hum. The hum comes right from the driver membrane. If you look at the cross-over for the speaker, it uses a rather elaborate xover topology. Tweeter and mid uses 4th order with quite a few resistors too. I feel like the music lacks microdynamic. The 4th order certainly helps keep distortion in check but I think it robs the music of its inner beauty. For example, I don't feel the music as much as I did with the Living Voice speaker I used to have. Guitars don't quite have the sparkle that I expect. Ideally, you want some air and bloom around the instruments but I don't feel it here. I'll email Troel about it. I'll post the picture once I can get a hold of a camera tomorrow. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
|
Here is the first version so far.
http://www.geocities.com/hai_vu1/AcapellaCab.JPG Here is the rear view http://www.geocities.com/hai_vu1/CabinetRear.jpg Here is the inside of the cabinet. I think I made a mistake of not providing a couple of verticle braces. This may partly explain the standing wave at around the midbass which is causing a pronounce hum. I put some stuffing right behind the driver which helps quite a bit. http://www.geocities.com/hai_vu1/RearNoStuffings.jpg |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
just another
diyAudio Moderator
|
Hi Andy,
Just a quick question. Is this hum present when there is no music playing?? or is it just a fuzziness to the sound when playing music? I'm wondering whether the problem is not with your speakers but with your amp, could be a case of the amp being fine with your old speakers but doesn't like these ones...... just a thought Tony. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
|
The hum only comes on when playing. It's not really a hum but a pronounce midbass boost -- to much of it though.
I put an extra layer of stuffings right behind the driver and it helps a lot but still on some recording its still there. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
just another
diyAudio Moderator
|
Hi Andy,
I just had a look at the original design and it looks like you have deviated from it quite a bit, Is the volume of your cabinet the same as the original cabinet??? what about the vent, from the picture of the back it looks like you have a very large hole in the back. My guess would be that your cabinet tuning for the woofer is not correct. you said that the cabinet volume is 42L, have you simulated this to see how the response curve looks? Tony. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
|
Quote:
It's not really a hum but more like a pronounce upper midbass lift on certain recordings. On others, I really don't here it. As for the cab volume, it is about 42L -- maybe a litter larger (about 44L) but not by much. I don't have any simulation tools so anyone knows how the bass will sound if I make the cabinet a little smaller? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
just another
diyAudio Moderator
|
Don't try shortening the port, if anything it should be a bit longer.
I got the specs for your woofer from seas web site and modeled it in unibox. It's not too far off the mark, graph attached. In the next post I will show what will happen if you shorten the port to 180mm Tony. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
just another
diyAudio Moderator
|
here is what happens when you reduce the port length to 180mm
note that the response peak goes up by another db. Two things I can think of that may be giving you problems. 1. The close proximity to the rear of the driver of one of your braces. you may be getting reflections off it messing up the sound. 2. This is a rear ported design, if you have it too close to the wall you may be getting a bass boost. This may not be just because of the rear port, the speaker may have baffle step compensation in the crossover, and if so and you place it too close to the wall the compensation may be too much. Tony. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
|
Hi Tony,
Thanks for the graphs. I thought that shorten the port in effect would reduce the Fb frequency therefore tighten up the bass. Of course you probably know it better than I do. As for your comment of the braces that might be causing the problem, I do see a lot of design with vertical brace right behind the driver so I figure it is not really a problem. Do you think the side panel is the problem? They don't have any braces in themselves but I'll try putting a few on them. Or do you think the cabinet is actually a little bigger than it should be? |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
just another
diyAudio Moderator
|
Well I'm only going off the modelling program but I think it is the other way around, shortening the port increases the box resonant frequency.....
I did a simulation in speaker workshop (quasi butterworth) to see what it thought was the best cabinet volume, it came in at about 50L (one of the things I don't like about unibox, is it won't necessarily recommend a good starting point). Anyway I modeled it in unibox with at 50L and it looks a little better than 42L so if anything your box is a little smaller than optimal, reducing it further will not help IMO.... if you change the volume you will need to further change the port tuning as well, and will probably end up with a slightly higher F3. here is the graph. Tony. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| any electric bass players? im building a bass guitar cab | KOA | Instruments and Amps | 27 | 30th April 2007 03:49 PM |
| fighting germanium noise? | space-cake | Instruments and Amps | 8 | 20th December 2006 08:54 PM |
| DBA (dual bass arrays) and active bass traps | capslock | Subwoofers | 3 | 20th August 2006 12:52 PM |
| For all Bass Junkies out there (Behringer Bass processor usage report) | VEC7OR | Digital Line Level | 5 | 27th October 2003 09:18 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11600 seconds (86.03% PHP - 13.97% MySQL) with 12 queries |