|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sweden
|
(Yes, I've used the search function...)
Anyone here must have built John Krutke's low diffraction box for the TB 871 driver? http://www.zaphaudio.com/audio-speaker11-box3.gif Basically, I wonder how the baffle detail would look from behind. If I would stand inside the box and look out through the driver, how would the box look? I've attached a image with my questions marked out. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks / C.J |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wisconsin
|
That's actually a very good question. The reason that dimension is shown isn't very clear.
Basically, the hole in the 2nd baffle layer starts out as a straight thru hole of 4.38" diameter. Then I used a 1/2" chamfer bit to chamfer the rest of the inside. That little flat area you see is where the ball bearing for the chamfer bit went around. That is why it's not a straight chamfer, the ball bearing needed a surface to ride on. Ps. If anyone needs a pair of these enclosures and lives in the US, I have an ugly pair here which I will give away for free as long as shipping is paid for. They are black truck bed liner finish, with whispermat damping inside. They are not the best looking but they work.
__________________
-Zaph|Audio- |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sweden
|
Thank you for the quick answer!
If the hole in the first baffle layer starts out with a diameter of 3 inches, and is chamfered at an angle of 45 degrees, that must mean that the hole ends with an diameter of 4.5 inches (increments 0.75" at each side.) But the 2nd baffle layer hole starts with a diameter of 4.38". I'll guess this mean the inside angle is not exactly 45 degrees, but somewhat less. I'm sitting far out in the swedish woods...for these things, internet is just perfect. PS. Any plans on putting that cheap 8" subwoofer design online? Or maybe drop it in my mailbox |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Laurel Springs N.J. (Near Philly)
|
CJN.....
I have the file from John's site for the subwoofer you are looking for. I don't know how to make it smaller to attach here. How can I send it to you? Figured it out! |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wisconsin
|
Quote:
For a better, smaller and louder option, see the attachments on the end of my post here.
__________________
-Zaph|Audio- |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
|
Quote:
Bass is a funny old thing... well actually it isn't, its contradictory I have a love hate relationship with bass, when its good you really know it, very very few systems do it exceptionally, quite a few do it well. An 8" isn't really ever going to reach down and provide you with what I'd call realistic levels of bass. 15" minimum for that exceptional bass with a good design for your chosen alignment. Anything over 20% THD at 20hz 90dB isn't acceptable IMO as far as top notch sub-bass goes. For an 8" driver it wouldn't be uncommon to see 200-300%+++ harmonic distortion. Other more important factors also come into play such as power compression, the harmonic breakdown and the energy time frequency spectrogram when measuring a subs performance. Take a look at some test a few of us got together and did with commercial subs here: http://www.avtalk.co.uk/forum/index....=50&rid=0&SQ=0 Virtually all the Velodynes including the DD18, HGS18 and SPL series were tested along with the Paradigm Reference Servo and powercube10, Plus quite a few others from Rel, SVS and the like. Frequency plot, THD by component and sum of components, power compression, group delay and ETF spectrograms were all the main tests for each sub. If you look at the small 8" and 10" subs they were all pretty terrible including the expensive rip off's from Rel. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
|
Zaph, any idea how much shipping will be to 43026?
If it's reasonable, I'll take dibs Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wisconsin
|
Quote:
15" as a minimum is too excessive, in my humble opinion. Of course it all depends on what an idividual considers exceptional. I have a 15" sub and a 500 watt amp right now and I rarely exceed a mm of excursion even though I have +/- 20mm available. I'm probably going to get rid of it and go with a more reasonable setup, not to mention something a little smaller than 5 cubic feet. Quote:
__________________
-Zaph|Audio- |
||
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
|
Wow, I'm an idiot. I bought a few of the Hi-Vi drivers and just glanced at the picture up top, thinking it was for the Hi-Vi and not the Tang Band. Cancel those cabinets!
Sorry |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
|
Quote:
Also you don't need huge enclosures even with large drivers, if your smart about your driver choices and EQ. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Zaph's New Design | sdclc126 | Multi-Way | 216 | 19th December 2009 01:56 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12548 seconds (79.30% PHP - 20.70% MySQL) with 11 queries |