|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Perth, Australia
|
I have an MTM system (Focal 5-inch kevlar midbass and Accuton tweeter) which I drive with my DIY Aleph-30s.
I'm very satisfied with the sound, but I'd like to extend the bass. I have two 11-inch Focal woofers (model 11V7511) which I want to use. The plan was to build two separate vented enclosures with one 11V7511 in each enclosure, then move to a biamp setup with the Aleph 30s driving the MTM and a Rotel 100W A/B amp driving the 11V7511s. The question is: should the port in the vented enclosure be at the front or the rear of the enclosure? What are the pros and cons of each? Any comments welcome. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Michigan
|
Hi Sud,
There is one thing you’ll want to watch out for. Don’t block or restrict the port by placing it too close to a wall (for a rear port). Other then that it is pretty much up to you. Rodd Yamas***a |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
In general, it's usually better to have the port on the rear. Since the spacing between the vent and the driver is relatively small considering the wavelengths the vent is going to produce, you don't really have to worry it being too far away from the driver to sum coherently.
Having it on the rear gives the big advantage of attenuating any stray midrange/distortion output that may exit the enclosure through the port - which generally can make a speaker quite a bit better. It also reduces the audibility (and measurability, of course) of any pipe resonances, as they tend to be at higher frequencies and will again be lower in amplitude due to the port facing away from you. Of course, this also obviates the ability to place the speakers directly against the wall, but this usually isn't a problem. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
try down firing.
you will need to mount the speakers about 2-3 inch of the gorund but the advantages are. 1. coupling to the floor (it helps to feel bass) 2. reduced air noise (if port dia is too small) 3. dont have to worry about the rear wall cheers
__________________
...still looking for the holy grail. |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Down-Firing or Rear Ports? | villeneuve | Subwoofers | 10 | 22nd April 2009 04:37 AM |
| Front or Rear Ports | s_c_leach | Multi-Way | 9 | 15th May 2005 12:17 PM |
| searching software to switch front speakers to rear and rear to front!-dolby surround | MCM | Everything Else | 6 | 6th February 2004 09:29 PM |
| Rear facing ports | MWP | Multi-Way | 2 | 4th December 2003 07:08 AM |
| Flared ports and dual vented / sealed design | Dave Bullet | Multi-Way | 3 | 23rd October 2002 12:04 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07834 seconds (75.96% PHP - 24.04% MySQL) with 10 queries |