|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
just another
diyAudio Moderator
|
Hi,
I have been playing around with a prototype design for my Morel MTM project.... some details here http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showt...594#post563594 each mid bass is in it's own sealed enclosure (box is partitioned).... what I had done was to model a single driver (average t/s params of all four drivers) in unibox, and then made two cavities of the size I came up with (plus a bit) I had been testing with the drivers in parallel, but wondered about connecting them in series. I decided for whatever reason to use unibox to model two drivers in parallel and found that it gave a volume bigger than double that for one driver... then I tried in series and it gave me a volume slightly less than double that of a single driver. unibox standard design comes up with the following: 1 midbass 6L 2 midbass series 10.7L 2 midbass parallel 15L now to confuse me even more a guy yesterday on the ESP forum told me that it should be the series configuration that needs a bigger box volume. so I guess to get to the point.... a. is unibox giving correct info when using the parallel/serial feature? b. if a is correct, then should i be making bigger boxes for my parallel configuration, even though I have the drivers in separate enclosures?? winisd pro and speaker workshop both simply double the volume for one driver.... Tony. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Account disabled at member's request
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Clifton Park, NY
|
Hi Tony,
For two drivers in a single box, the box volume needs to be double the volume for a single driver. The series or parallel connections does not impact box volume only SPL output. I have a short write-up for modeling two drivers in a single box on my site : http://www.quarter-wave.com/General/Two_Drivers.pdf The three examples demonstrate the system response for one and two drivers. Hope that helps, |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
just another
diyAudio Moderator
|
Thanks Martin
nice to get a very authoritative answer I downloaded the lite version of mathcad to play with your worksheets, but only for the TL stuff..... maybe I should have a look at the other ones too. I'm interested though as to why unibox is giving different volumes for series and parallel connections... I guess I'd have to ask the author that question! I think I just found out what was causing it!! I had a series resistance of .5 Ohms in the model, if I remove it both series and parallel connections come up with the same volume.... I think I had put it in as a guess as to what the series resistance of my crossover would be. edit : my stupid mistake I had it in the field for Series resistance due to amplifier output impedance and speaker cabling..... not .5 Ohms!!! putting it into the correct field means no change for series/parallel Tony. edit: well I have botched my prototype a bit, since the volume is about a litre more than it should be but..... at least that is curable |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Three 10" 4Ohm subs, wired in series or series-parallel? | Nagamitsu | Car Audio | 24 | 10th May 2009 03:24 AM |
| CORRECT Capacitor connection parallel to a Zener | arupg | Solid State | 2 | 20th October 2007 04:39 PM |
| Series connection of filaments | leadbelly | Tubes / Valves | 24 | 15th August 2007 12:12 PM |
| L pad and series resistor effect on sound | Frankx | Multi-Way | 4 | 31st October 2005 03:10 PM |
| parallel connection | rulezzz | Chip Amps | 39 | 22nd February 2004 01:59 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08807 seconds (75.28% PHP - 24.72% MySQL) with 10 queries |