Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th July 2005, 12:04 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Madmike2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto
Default 1 st order spacing

Ok i am winding my inductor now and i made my caps (value). I am curious if i should cut the tweeter at 3500 7.9 uf and the woofer at 2500 .5 mH . does that make sense? its 6 db / octave that would roll them in nearly half an octave correct?
__________________
Persistence is better then intelligence. Unless persistence kills you.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2005, 01:52 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, The Nutmeg State
Here's a crude calculator to give you some idea of the values of the inductor and capacitor.

Use the same frequency for both tweeter and woofer.

No guarantees it will come out right, but that is the theoretical ideal.

http://www.the12volt.com/caraudio/crosscalc.asp#ccc

By the way, what is your spacing between the center of the woof and the center of the tweeter? I gather you are crossing over at 3,000 Hz.
__________________
"A friend will help you move. A really good friend will help you move a body."
-Anonymous
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2005, 03:19 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Madmike2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto
I dont need that but thanks though. I am beyond that. Now i am trying to decide where to cross over. it doesnt make sense to me that they cross over at same frequency since its 6 db per octave. thats alot of overlap.

i am playing them right now with .5 mH and a reversed tweeter at 7.7 uF thats 2500 and 3300. Dont ask me why it sounds better reverse on the tweeter . it just does :P ...... gonna play here for a bit then move it up and see if xing over at same frequency sounds right.

Incidently i seem to have lost bass response since i took that 4th order crossover apart. The distortion is gone as well but where went my bass ?
__________________
Persistence is better then intelligence. Unless persistence kills you.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2005, 04:14 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Madmike2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto
I take that back .... i unwound the coil to bring it up 3300 hz and then put the polarity back in the tweeter. SOunds much better the paper midrange sound is gone. I wanna try to put some juice into it tommorow and measure the impedance and frequency and find out where it rises. This is a lot more fun then bring the bins and hook it all up.
__________________
Persistence is better then intelligence. Unless persistence kills you.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2005, 06:16 AM   #5
sasha is offline sasha  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
If You planing to build more speakers in the future, it is good idea to buy digital crossover something like Behringer 2496.
It is not expensive and even less if you buy it used.
Don't be afraid to play with crossover fr. or order or type. Also it is not forbidden to try different x-over points for mid-bass and tweeter or different order or even different type.
Of course very important is loudness matching between drivers.
All that is possible in a flash with digital crossover. Just be careful not to fry tweeter with wrong setting!
Hey, if it sounds OK who cares if the x-over point
is different for two drivers or if the slope is not the same?
It is Your speaker and make it to your taste. Measurements can be wrong and misleading. Use Your ears.

Regards.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2005, 09:10 AM   #6
CLS is offline CLS  Taiwan
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Taiwan
In my experiences, 1st order HP/LP passive filters for speaker drivers at the same frequency would often produce a wide bump around it.

After many experiments, I found separating them to 1 octave apart would be nice (at least to my ears).

1st order Xover is far from "ideal" & never flat. And dip is better then bump. It's much less offensive.

If rising the mid-bass LP frequency sounded better, you might try taking off that coil & let it sing all the way it can. Then adjust the HP point of the tweeter by reducing the cap. When the high merging in nicely, it would mostly sound even better, at least on mid to low level.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1st order Passive Line Level Crossover + 2nd order Highpass? alexclaber Multi-Way 11 4th January 2008 07:15 PM
deceptive perception ? 1st order-2nd order question poldus Multi-Way 4 10th April 2007 11:58 PM
2nd Order Tweeter + 3rd Order Woofer = OK? Jay Multi-Way 3 12th September 2005 12:12 PM
1st Order Tweeter, 3rd Order Woofer? Jay Multi-Way 8 8th May 2004 09:29 PM
1st order ? L-R 2nd order? or transient perfect?? Ken L Multi-Way 6 17th October 2003 04:22 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:09 PM.

Page generated in 0.08580 seconds (74.03% PHP - 25.97% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio