|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
|
Hey,
I'm building what I suppose would be very large bookshelf speakers and beginning to think they will look stupid on stands as well as unstable. I don't want to alter the depth/width to get them higher so can I make a second cavity under the primary one so they look like floorstanders? The upper enclosure would have at least 3.6cm (1.4"?) of MDF seperating it from the lower cavity and will be lined with bitumen sheeting. Will the bottom cavity effect the sound? Should it be sealed or open at the back? The bottom cavity will be around 35-40cm high and around 10 liters. TIA, Anonymoose |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Italy
|
(sorry for my english)
Hi anonymoose, Yes, The "base" affect the sound but it is inevitable. Sometimes people put the crossover in the bottom box and I think it is a good solution if you must "to adjust" the filter for a long time. When the filter will be ok you can to fill with fine sand. If you are very exacting you can also seriously decoupling the box from the base but it is very expansive ( see Newport air spring and similar devices). regards |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
|
Thanks for the input Inertial. Don't apologise for your english, its a hundred times better than my Italian
I was thinking about filling it with sand, but a 10+liter cavity filled with sand would make the speakers very heavy. What about something dense but lighter? I've heard of people using cat litter and even that expanding builders foam. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Cat litter,I dont think its very dense.You have two approaches
High mass or low mass + damping(thin ply+ bitumenous stuff) Mike.e |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Greets!
Kitty litter is massive enough and my fave. The insulation foam is great for keeping cavities from resonating, but isn't suitable for mass loading. Sand, Portland cement, etc., is overkill so you could fill it partly with sand or cement and finish off with the foam. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eugene, OR
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Greets!
True, but the cab itself isn't particularly light for those of us with bad backs/hands/whatever, so the ~32% less weight of kitty litter can be the difference between moving it around ourselves or getting someone to do it for us. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Coupled cavity aspect of Karlson enclosures | freddi | Multi-Way | 0 | 13th December 2006 11:44 AM |
| What DO YOU base your next project /needs on ??? | JinMTVT | Multi-Way | 21 | 17th November 2005 11:54 PM |
| coupled cavity sub | maquiniana_phil | Subwoofers | 3 | 19th May 2005 06:27 PM |
| base for amp | karma | Tubes / Valves | 7 | 18th June 2004 03:03 AM |
| Bed base as a big sub? | DPW666 | Multi-Way | 9 | 10th March 2003 07:48 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09621 seconds (75.90% PHP - 24.10% MySQL) with 10 queries |