|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Barcelona
|
I am currently building some small mini-monitor speakers using a 4.5" Vifa driver, my question is where to put the port?
What is the difference in putting the bass reflex port at the front or at the back? What are advantages of putting the port at the front? or the rear? Does it really matter? as I assume that the bass radiating from the port is pretty omni-directional Your advice please, thanks in advance |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: -
|
If you want to put them on a bookshelf a rear port will be a problem.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Detroit
|
This depends on where you plan on placing said speakers. If
you plan on putting near wall you would want it front-mounted rear facing help fill out the lower bass but if you have a sub no need right. But another reason would be because front baffle is too crammed so by facing it rear it gives more room for your front baffle. hope this helps!
__________________
It,s people like you,that make people like me, hang out with people like that! |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Barcelona
|
Thanks all for you replies so quickly
I assume that I will have a tauter bass from the front firing, the rear firing will get a bass boost from the rear reflection (up to +3dB) but less focused Correct? |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
Quote:
The only real difference is that spurious noises from a port will be diffused from a rear mounted port and therefore less audible - using that argument, your sound will likely be purer with rear mounting....
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Science is a way of thinking much more than it is a body of knowledge. --Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Portugal
|
After hearing some loudspeakers, is very subjective, each one with its quality but some that frighten me are the M.A. Studio 20SE... where are the port?
With rear port, maybe you'll have some problems with ressonance...
__________________
DIYers de lingua Portuguesa: |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Barcelona
|
Due to lack of space the speaker will probably be placed about 30 cm from the rear wall.
The reason why I ask is that I already have a small pair of JBL mini monitors with a rear firing port. They are placed in the corner giving a some bass lift, they sound dull and life less when placed away from the the rear boundary, but then bass from a small speaker.... Sounds like I need a experiment. What I will do is make a pair with from firing port and also make another pair rear firing - I have enough of everything to make 2 pairs - see which I like the best.. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Perth
|
IMHO the sole advantage of a front facing port is so you can place your speakers RIGHT UP against a wall.
If you have even only 10cm (4") to spare from the rear panel to the wall, use a rear firing port. RonE has hit the nail on the head with this one... You can build two pairs of enclosures but it's a lot of work... |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Barcelona
|
OK, thanks all for your good advice, sounds like a rear port is the answer.
I can also have a larger port on the rear so should reduce port velocity and thus reduce port noise. Thanks tktran - I have 4 woofers and 4 tweeters so will build 4 enclosures anyway... |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: loughborough/ rochester
|
or you could put the port on the top- frees up space on the baffle, reduced effect of midrange leakage as its firing 90 degrees upwards rather than straight at you, and most speakers are taller than they are deep so it means you can use a bigger diameter port that would otherwise be too long to fit in the box.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Down-Firing or Rear Ports? | villeneuve | Subwoofers | 10 | 22nd April 2009 05:37 AM |
| Rear or front port? | Speek | Multi-Way | 1 | 7th September 2005 09:58 AM |
| searching software to switch front speakers to rear and rear to front!-dolby surround | MCM | Everything Else | 6 | 6th February 2004 10:29 PM |
| Rear facing ports | MWP | Multi-Way | 2 | 4th December 2003 08:08 AM |
| Vented enclosures: ports at the front or rear? | Sud | Multi-Way | 4 | 17th September 2002 08:49 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10871 seconds (82.11% PHP - 17.89% MySQL) with 10 queries |