Anybody out there replacing high-end speaker's passive crossovers with active ones? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th May 2005, 06:08 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
wigginjs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Columbia, SC
Default Anybody out there replacing high-end speaker's passive crossovers with active ones?

I was sitting around thinking to myself while working on my active 3-way design "Self, why is it that virtually no speaker manufacturers offer an active crossed loudspeaker even though it is superior to passive crossovers?". I haven't found an answer to that one, but it did get me thinking about the idea of buying nice pre-built speakers and replacing the passive crossovers with something like a Behringer DCX2496. I personally am going to use a PC with KXProject drivers as my active crossover, but I was wondering if anyone had any experience replacing existing passive crossovers with active ones in pre-built speakers. Specific examples and explaination of the results (and even pictures!) would really be appreciated.
__________________
The Four Chairs
DIY Home Theater
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2005, 06:26 PM   #2
tiroth is offline tiroth  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Yup.

Finished: Proac 2.5 active xo

My reasoning is that on the lower end, going active is too expensive for what the market is willing to pay. On the high end, people are heavily invested in their megabuck amps, interconnects, preamps etc and may be unwilling to give them up (or multiply them by 2x or 3x) for an active design.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2005, 06:31 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern California
Default Active vs. Passive

In a single word COST. It's all about the hardware.

Additionally, most audiophiles like to change equipment..... active speakers limit the ability to make those changes.

Having said that, several high end companies currently market multiway active systems... as for example:

ATC
Meridian
Pass Labs


Cyclotronguy
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2005, 06:36 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
chris ma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Pickering, Canada
Yeah, Meridian has gone active in the early 80s
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2005, 06:57 PM   #5
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Hi,
Naim, Linn, ARC and others (in the UK) used to offer after market kits to convert their own passive speakers to active. All of them were expensive without the power amps.
I have just done what you are proposing. BehringerDCX2496 to develop an active xover with eq and various roll offs to find what works then discard this and use the numbers to build a discrete analogue xover to run the stereo system for real. Current thread for xover boards taking orders soon.
By the way this Scotsman is not as wasteful as it seems, the Behringer (2 off) gets used (permanently) to run an active surround system & sub.
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th May 2005, 07:15 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
audiobomber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sudbury, Ontario Canada
Default Re: Anybody out there replacing high-end speaker's passive crossovers with active ones?

Quote:
Originally posted by m0tion
I was wondering if anyone had any experience replacing existing passive crossovers with active ones in pre-built speakers. Specific examples and explaination of the results (and even pictures!) would really be appreciated.
I have a pair of Energy 22 Reference Connoisseur speakers: Floorstanding, vented 2-way, 7" proprietary poly woofer, Winston Burhoe tweeter, 1-1/4" thick cabinets, no parallel interior surfaces, slanted baffle, offset tweeter. I did some tweaks to improve the cabinet, then I replaced the dirt-cheap crossover parts with audiophile-quality parts.

Last summer a friend lent me a Marchand XM1, and I tried frequency modules for 1.5, 2.0 & 2.4kHz, LR4. The 2k XO sounded best of the bunch and I then bought a Marchand XM44-3 with the same slopes. I also bought a pair of 10" subs.

Eventually I started to get very critical of the sound of the system, it seemed to be doing everything right (ie not making any bad sounds) but musically it was boring. I tried the passive XO again, but I wasn't satisfied after hearing the potential of the active system.

Then I read the Loudspeaker Cookbook and realized that my LR4 slopes were giving me 5th and 6th-order acoustic slopes. I decided to mimic the original XO electronically, so I bought 2nd-order woofer & 3rd-order tweeter modules at 1.5kHZ. This was a huge improvement. If you're going to replace a passive with active, I suggest replicating the original slope and hinge point.

Just to finish the story, I lately replaced the original tweeters with the Usher 9950-20, and I'm thrilled with the results. That is a sweet tweeter, and it handles 1.5k, no problem.

Upgrading my old speakers was definitely worthwhile. I highly recommend this as a way to get very expensive sound on a minimal budget. There are some great cabs and drivers in these older designs.
__________________
Dan
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2005, 04:28 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
audiobomber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sudbury, Ontario Canada
Default Re: Re: Anybody out there replacing high-end speaker's passive crossovers with active ones?

Quote:
Originally posted by audiobomber

I lately replaced the original tweeters with the Usher 9950-20, and I'm thrilled with the results. That is a sweet tweeter, and it handles 1.5k, no problem.
I take the above back. They're distorting badly at 1.5k, third-order Butterworth. I'm now using LR4 at 2k, which doesn't make me happy. I may try BW3 at 2K, but I'll probably have to change the woofer too.
__________________
Dan
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2005, 05:20 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Audubon, PA
Quote:
Originally posted by chris ma
Yeah, Meridian has gone active in the early 80s
Meridian crossovers are beyond the conventional definition of active - they are digital. A DSP splits the input signal into the various frequency bands followed by one DAC and one power amp for each band. In the case of the four-way DSP8000 speakers this leads to eight DACs and eight power amps for stereo.
__________________
Mike
"Never confuse motion with action." B. Franklin
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2005, 06:12 PM   #9
Nuuk is offline Nuuk  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Nuuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset, SW England
When you take out the passive crossover components, you change the alignment of the whole system. So when changing from passive to active crossovers, you may need to change the volume of the cabinet. This is more true with vented designs than selaed boxes which are unlikely to require any changes.

When I changed from passive to active crossovers on my own (vented) speakers, I had to increase the cabinet volume from 27 litres to 33 litres for best performance.

The bottom line with vented designs is that it may not be as easy as just swapping the crossovers over if you want optimal performance!
__________________
The truth need not be veiled, for it veils itself from the eyes of the ignorant.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2005, 08:20 PM   #10
AndrewT is offline AndrewT  Scotland
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
Hi Nuuk,
could you talk us through that change in alignment going active from passive in some more detail?
Is it due to reduced resistance in series with the bass unit? which has a direct effect on Qts. or am I up the wrong tree?
__________________
regards Andrew T.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
high pass crossover - active, passive, simple or complex? nick78 Parts 1 23rd May 2006 06:43 AM
Are High quality opamps important in active crossovers? SillyGalah Parts 30 30th March 2006 06:47 PM
Cascade high Q passive w/low Q active geotech Multi-Way 0 1st April 2005 07:53 AM
dB loss by using passive crossovers? Active vs Passive and 1st vs 4th order Hybrid fourdoor Multi-Way 3 11th July 2004 09:16 PM
3 or 4-way active High End speaker ??? Jan Dupont Multi-Way 70 29th May 2004 05:28 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:27 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2