|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois
|
I bought some Polk R30's when they were onsale heavily at CC (150 dollars for the pair). Unfortunatly, they are the system I listen to 90% of the time, since my big speakers can't fit in my little apartment. I think that I could get some better performance out of them if I upgrade them a little bit.
First, the Polk R30 is a 2 way design consisting of a 6.5" woofer, .75" tweeter, and 2 inch (could be a bit more), port. I checked out the x-over and it appears to be a second order, other than that, I don't know the x-over points, however it was made with cheap components, and very small gauge wire inductors, which I am sure rob performace (they were 18 or smaller gauge). I have never designed an x-over before, but I thought this would be a great place to start because these speakers are relativly cheap. I was thinking I could measure the theile small parameters of them, and then design an xover for them (I was thinking 4th order L-R arrangement since it's phase is shifted 360 degrees), and a zobel, could really get some more performance out of them. Any other mods I should concider. They have no foam or damping of any sort in them that I could see. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
Are you against using an EQ?
Other than that, it's still going to sound like a Polk. Not to say anythings wrong with that but you're not happy now and neither was I. Mine are now being used for the rear channels of my HT. Cal |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois
|
Well, I am not going to be using an EQ, but I just thought that I could suck some more performance out of them instead of buying/building a whole new system.
Basically I know I can't change the sound, but I can change the performance, if that makes any sense, so I can have something a little more interesting to listen to. However if there were some drivers that I could do a drop in replacement for, with a new x-over, I'd be willing to concider that too, but after building my new gigantic (over 200L each), boxes, I am sick of much woodworking. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
|
I just ran across a pair of these at the local pawn emporium for $75. I'm curious what you did with yours and what your results were. I need another pair of speakers like a hole in the head, but its still a temptation when I come across a bargain.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need some help fixing this amp | mazeroth | Solid State | 1 | 13th May 2008 03:04 AM |
| CAL CL-5 -- Worth Fixing? | neddyboy | Digital Source | 0 | 29th May 2007 02:56 AM |
| Need Help Fixing an old NAD 304 | li_gangyi | Solid State | 14 | 8th December 2004 07:59 PM |
| Help! Fixing Amp. | shajan | Solid State | 20 | 29th May 2004 08:06 AM |
| Fixing Cabinet | techno | Multi-Way | 2 | 15th August 2001 02:04 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08320 seconds (70.34% PHP - 29.66% MySQL) with 10 queries |