|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Some drivers come in both 4ohm and 8ohm versions and when you compare their specs they are virtually the same except the Le and Qes are lower for the 4ohm version. My question is what is the physical difference between the two ? Is there a generalized effect on frequency response? Is it something that would be a fairly simple modification as a DIYer ?
__________________
Everyone has a photographic memory. It's just that most are out of film. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Illinois
|
Do you mean a DIY mod to the driver itself or a difference in how it is used, the size of its box, the components in the crossover?
One obvious feature is that it will play louder at 4 ohms than at 8, assuming your amplifier can provide the added current. You can't change the driver's manufactured impedance. Automobile drivers are often at 4 ohms, home systems at 8 ohms. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I'm talking about modifying the driver itself. That's why I would like to know the physical difference between 2 otherwise identical drivers. Is it a different number of turns of wire on the VC? A different gauge of wire on the VC? Would there be much effect on 1w/1m sensitivity or overall FR?
__________________
Everyone has a photographic memory. It's just that most are out of film. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
|
Costa Rica man,
I'd like to know also. One of those questions, I've just never asked. If I were to guess, I would think it has something to do with the thickness of the coating on the magnet wire. Can't see it being a thinner wire, I'd think there would be power issues there. Looking forward to knowing. Cal |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Cal,
I don't know about the coating idea because I don't see that changing the Le. Maybe it's just less turns of the same magnet wire on the coil, which would reduce Le, but what effect would that have on efficiency and response? I ask because I need a pair of high efficiency, low impedance full range drivers. If it's just a matter of detaching the surround and spider, then unwinding some of the VC, and putting it back together, then I'm willing to give it a try unless I can expect a corresponding decrease in sensitivity or adversely affecting the FR.
__________________
Everyone has a photographic memory. It's just that most are out of film. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ISOBARIC 16 ohms load powered by 8 ohms Amp | eddi0 | Subwoofers | 24 | 21st October 2006 03:29 PM |
| Any other reason for using 4 ohms version of driver other than power ? | thinker10 | Multi-Way | 26 | 6th June 2006 07:52 AM |
| Speakers: 8 ohms vs. 16 ohms | KT | Multi-Way | 2 | 14th April 2006 05:06 PM |
| zen on 4 ohms | trancy | Pass Labs | 5 | 29th February 2004 06:54 PM |
| ohms | trip-wire | Everything Else | 9 | 25th December 2002 09:05 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |