|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#81 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Prairie Wasteland, Canada
|
Reality TV just adds to my vault of sociopathic urges...gotta keep the demons locked up!
Yours truly, Partly Kidding.
__________________
Fighting the program since 1976. |
|
|
#82 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Mars
|
Quote:
with lots of clean spl. Horns do this well but SQ suffers a bit compared to a quality dome. But the dome lacks in output. The SA fits in the middle. High quality, high spl and not 'horn sound'. Problem is... expensive. I don't consider it a step down in quality over true ribbon, SQ is subjective I think people that compare the planar to a ribbon will normally say the ribbon is better.. mainly because what planars have they compare with ? Lets say you compare the cheapest $30 PT2 planar to the cheapest Fountek ribbon that cost 4x more. Everyone will say the ribbon is better. How much better. Some say 5% - 15% better and the upgrade is not justified. Others are willing to pay 4x more to get the small % improvement. It's not a fair comparison, a $25 driver vs. a $100 driver. The SA planar will beat the $100 ribbon, but again not a fair fight, a $600 planar vs. a $100 ribbon -- hehehe I compared a single SA {8" tweeter} to an array of PT2's, eight of them. A 52" line {1 ohm load, parallel wiring} vs. an 8" line. Cost $240 vs. $600. The SA can easily generate as much spl or even more and sound cleaner. While the PT2 line is impressive vs. a single PT2 and the price is cheaper, $240 vs. $600, the SA still comes out the winner if I had to pick between the two solutions. The only thing that lacks is the big sound stage created by the big array, and the SA has to be aimed to get the sweet spot, but once you have that sweet spot dialed in, it's.... sweet ... rofl... Now expand on the idea. SA line array... That is major evil .......
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
diyAudio Editor
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Francisco, USA
|
I agree with your post, and I'm glad you elaborated. I actually was also trying to say that those "truisms" -that one type of technology is always "better" than another, usually have exceptions, and from what I've read the SA's are exceptional
As you also mention, how things are used makes a difference too... |
|
|
#84 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Mars
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
diyAudio Editor
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Francisco, USA
|
I think all the points that can be made have been made on this topic, so I'm closing the thread Variac- DIY MODERATOR |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07324 seconds (83.06% PHP - 16.94% MySQL) with 11 queries |