|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: 8800 ft above sea level
|
I'm building some MTMs. My receiver says it is rated for 6-16 ohm loads. For the sake of discussion, let's assume that's true.
So I have 2 mid/woofs, Re 6.2 ohms each. I can: 1. wire series and get 12.4 ohms 2. wire parallel , get 3.1 ohms and put a 3 ohm resistor in series. I know the series resistor wastes power, but it is still presenting just half the impedance to the amp, so wouldn't it be more efficient? i.e. greater SPL? OK, now I'm sitting here with 12 of these mid/woofs, so don't tell me to just get 4 ohm drivers, thanks, or to just make them MMTMMs. The question is would you do 1 or 2 and why? Oh, yeah, one other thing. I'm planning on a zobel for these. I know how to do it for the series, but I'm wondering if I couldn't put it across the outputs of the XO if I do parallel, basing it on the 3.1 ohms? Or do I have to put one across each driver's terminals? TIA MB
__________________
"Whenever you find you are on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect." Mark Twain |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: U of Waterloo
|
Definitely go with series (12 Ohms DC). The amp will be much happier. You are gaining efficiency by adding the second woofer, so dont worry about the high impedance.
There will be more distortion at 6 ohms and you are dropping half your power on a resistor. And do one zobel for the measured impedance curve with the drivers in series. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
yes series... your amp will be happier & it will sound better...
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Agree with series although be aware that the speaker DC resistance (Re) is not really what you should be looking at from a 'rating' point of view. That is an 8 ohm sppeaker you have there so parallel would give you 4 ohms impedance.
Using parallel then adding a resistor to bump up will totally change the damping of the speaker for the worse.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: 8800 ft above sea level
|
Thanks all, I was definately leaning toward series, but it's nice to have some more experienced opinions. I figured it would be easier on the amp, and I've got 110 watts per anyway. ANd it does simplify the zobel.
MB
__________________
"Whenever you find you are on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect." Mark Twain |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: morph
|
okay, so I have a similar dilemma. I am wiring a 5.1 surround system. I have four 8 ohm small tower speakers that are identical. I would like to use one for L, one for R, and two for the center channel, w/ some smaller bookshelves for surrounds. I have a standard surround 55 X 7 HK receiver and an audiosource amp one/a (80W X2 bridgeable to 200 W). I can use either the HK or the outboard audiosource for this application. Keep in mind the HK amps will still be driving at least the rear 2 channels and possibly the front L and R.
I can wire the two identical speakers in a number of ways. I could: A. Run them in parallel either w/ one channel (better idea) of the audiosource or in bridged mode (probably not a good idea). I could also use the center channel of the HK for this. Of course, this means the HK would see a four ohm speaker on the center channel, which may or may not be a problem. B. Run a splitter before the audiosource and then simply run each speaker from the standard outputs. C. Bridge the audiosource amp (or not) and run the two speakers in series. This way I would have 16 ohms, and the amp, being bridged, would see half of that (8). This seems like the best option--however, I read this online: Quote:
Please help--any input would be greatly appreciated. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
That is what i would do Quote:
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
||
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Agree with all Dave said there.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: morph
|
thanks for your input. I'm not quite sure I understand what you said in the second part of the post regarding series and distortion.
So you would run a splitter, then? This sounds like it would be a good option, too. Question: Do you think I'd get the same level of performance just running one of the speakers instead of two? Thanks |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Depends how loud you want it!
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Three 10" 4Ohm subs, wired in series or series-parallel? | Nagamitsu | Car Audio | 24 | 10th May 2009 03:24 AM |
| series or parallel? | medicman | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 22nd January 2009 04:42 PM |
| Series vs parallel? | legendaryfrog | Full Range | 5 | 14th December 2006 02:50 PM |
| series vs parallel SPL? | 2litre | Multi-Way | 16 | 22nd February 2006 09:58 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |