|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois
|
Is it possible to experimentally tune a port, because in all of the simulations are a bit different and very short (2 inches?) for a 28hz tuning?
So could I try a bunch of different tunings and see where it is the most agreeable? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
When ports are that short, there can be significant error in the calculations due to the approximate nature of the end corrections. You would be better off using a larger diameter port - which would require a longer tube.
The proper formula (from first principles except for the end corrections) is: Lv = 2361*Dv^2/(Fb^2*Vb)-K*Dv where K is 0.85 for a tube flanged at both ends (or shorter than ~50mm) and K=0.73 for a tube flanged at one end and free on the other. Lv is port length in mm and Dv is port diameter in mm - Vb is box volume in liters. If you want to tune by listening and experiment - go ahead....
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. —Aldous Huxley |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois
|
I am using a 4" flared port, I don't think it gets much larger than that (that I have seen).
Maybe there is something wrong with my calculations? |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm
|
If your box is about 270 litres, the calculation are correct. Still, such a short port is very easily overloaded. Try using several ports instead, maybe 4 of them. Then the port lengths should be 280 mm, which is far better in terms of overload margin.
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
Quote:
Wiht a box that large, you are probbaly using a large woofer or several of them. There is more to port design than just figuring length - it is best to model port velocity and try to make sure it will stay below ~17 m/s at the highest listening level you will be using. As SVante says, it will probably take multiple ports.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. —Aldous Huxley |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois
|
I am going to have 2 10" Dayton RS270s in a 214 liter box, with around 15 liters going into a subenclosure for the mid, and has 5 pounds of polyfill in it.
I have a hole made for the 4" flared port. which is around 6.5" at the outside end around 5 or 5.5 inch diameter on the inside flare. The T/S parameters are found at http://www.partsexpress.com/pdf/295-368z.txt at the bottom. Thanks for all of your help! |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois
|
Does anyone have an idea for me?
I think the port mach for a single 4" should be fine, however it's just so short, is there anyway I can fix this without purchasing another port? I already have enough budget overruns. |
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN
|
Quote:
If it were me, I'd make the port about 5" long. But leave room to experiment.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. --Carl Sagan Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescence--those are the three pillars of Western prosperity. —Aldous Huxley |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois
|
My port is rear firing, but all of my calculations say like 2.5 inches, where are you getting 5" from?
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois
|
Oh and the boxes are already stuffed, there is nothing I can do about that, they are sealed up.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tuning port on MLTL : how ? | sadhill | Full Range | 7 | 8th October 2008 07:43 PM |
| What’s going on with my port tuning? | Brownee | Multi-Way | 28 | 19th May 2008 07:46 AM |
| Question about port tuning | ostie01 | Subwoofers | 3 | 26th September 2005 01:30 AM |
| MLTL port tuning | Josephjcole | Full Range | 9 | 4th August 2005 01:22 PM |
| newbie port tuning | elfman222 | Multi-Way | 1 | 27th February 2003 03:53 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |