Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th April 2005, 09:43 PM   #1
svokke is offline svokke  Belgium
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Leuven
Default first order crossover

Is there any reason why first order ACTIVE crossovers aren't used?Besides the slow rolloff that is. In my system (4-way) this isn't a problem for the sub to bass crossover.
The advantage is that they can be very simple, just using some buffers to ensure controllable input and output impedance.
Greetings, Svokke
__________________
In illusion comfort lies
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th April 2005, 09:51 PM   #2
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
 
richie00boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gloucestershire, England, UK
Probably because since you are going active, you can use far more effective higher order crossovers, so why bother with the poor mans version?
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th April 2005, 10:01 PM   #3
svokke is offline svokke  Belgium
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Leuven
I want it as simple as possible, why making the crossover more complex while messing up the phase response more?
__________________
In illusion comfort lies
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th April 2005, 10:22 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
leadbelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Default Re: first order crossover

Quote:
Originally posted by svokke
Is there any reason why first order ACTIVE crossovers aren't used?Besides the slow rolloff that is. In my system (4-way) this isn't a problem for the sub to bass crossover.
You best be sure about that. Using 1st order crossovers in a 4 way system sounds like a recipe for disaster. I hope there is facet you are not telling us like sharp acoustical rolloff and wide as possible crossover points.
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th April 2005, 10:25 PM   #5
mike.e is offline mike.e  New Zealand
diyAudio Member
 
mike.e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NZ
Send a message via ICQ to mike.e Send a message via MSN to mike.e
From what ive read,1st order filters sound no better than 4th order LR.

http://www.woodartistry.com/linkwitzlab/x-sb80-3wy.htm

http://www.geocities.com/kreskovs/
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2005, 12:50 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
David Gatti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Yes, there's no reason why you can't use 1st order active crossovers, the main benefit of which is sensitivity matching. The reason they're not so common is that 1st order filters are relatively simple in passive form, so why bother with complex active.
Also, 1st order fans tend to be purists & aren't keen on using op-amps.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2005, 02:04 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
5th element's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England
Quote:
Originally posted by David Gatti
Also, 1st order fans tend to be purists & aren't keen on using op-amps.
I always find that funny, little do they realise (or do but dont like to admit it) that their precious music has been sent thru hundreds of them prior to reaching our ears.

Anyway yeah there is no reason really to use 1st order especially in a bass application. You really want really steep filters on the sub to ensure that no nasties get thru from the break up subs usually suffer at around 300-500hz. Also if your going to the trouble of using active anyway, 4th order electrical filters are not much more complicated then a 1st order.

You also dont have to worry about phase issues so much at low frequencies because the wavelengths are so long.
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack!
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2005, 04:57 AM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
David Gatti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Does that explain the processed quality of many of todays recordings compared to 30 years ago?
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2005, 07:08 AM   #9
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
 
richie00boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gloucestershire, England, UK
No, that's due to the much heavier use of compression and also tailoring the sound to mass market taste and equipment. Also there are a lot of small studios now and recording techniques have changed in that time.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2005, 08:18 AM   #10
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
If your speakers are suited to 1st order, you can do an acive XO very elegantly by implementing the filter in the amp -- either at the input or in between 2 stages....

In a hi-pass you just shrink the value of a coupling cap to an appropriate value, for a low pass you need to add a series R, alnong with a cap shunted to ground.

No op-amps, no extra stages.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LR 4th order vs LR 8th order crossover redliner Subwoofers 1 7th January 2009 11:32 PM
1st order Passive Line Level Crossover + 2nd order Highpass? alexclaber Multi-Way 11 4th January 2008 07:15 PM
Another 2nd/4th-order L-R active crossover johnf Solid State 6 7th April 2005 10:16 AM
1st and 2nd Order Crossover Design rookster Multi-Way 16 11th May 2003 05:36 PM
Crossover - 1st Order GeniX Multi-Way 3 20th September 2002 02:39 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:44 PM.

Page generated in 0.11588 seconds (76.63% PHP - 23.37% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio