|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Leuven
|
Is there any reason why first order ACTIVE crossovers aren't used?Besides the slow rolloff that is. In my system (4-way) this isn't a problem for the sub to bass crossover.
The advantage is that they can be very simple, just using some buffers to ensure controllable input and output impedance. Greetings, Svokke
__________________
In illusion comfort lies |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
Probably because since you are going active, you can use far more effective higher order crossovers, so why bother with the poor mans version?
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Leuven
|
I want it as simple as possible, why making the crossover more complex while messing up the phase response more?
__________________
In illusion comfort lies |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
From what ive read,1st order filters sound no better than 4th order LR.
http://www.woodartistry.com/linkwitzlab/x-sb80-3wy.htm http://www.geocities.com/kreskovs/ |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Yes, there's no reason why you can't use 1st order active crossovers, the main benefit of which is sensitivity matching. The reason they're not so common is that 1st order filters are relatively simple in passive form, so why bother with complex active.
Also, 1st order fans tend to be purists & aren't keen on using op-amps. |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Anyway yeah there is no reason really to use 1st order especially in a bass application. You really want really steep filters on the sub to ensure that no nasties get thru from the break up subs usually suffer at around 300-500hz. Also if your going to the trouble of using active anyway, 4th order electrical filters are not much more complicated then a 1st order. You also dont have to worry about phase issues so much at low frequencies because the wavelengths are so long.
__________________
What the hell are you screamin' for? Every five minutes there's a bomb or somethin'! I'm leavin! bzzzz! Droggon Attack! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Does that explain the processed quality of many of todays recordings compared to 30 years ago?
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
No, that's due to the much heavier use of compression and also tailoring the sound to mass market taste and equipment. Also there are a lot of small studios now and recording techniques have changed in that time.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
If your speakers are suited to 1st order, you can do an acive XO very elegantly by implementing the filter in the amp -- either at the input or in between 2 stages....
In a hi-pass you just shrink the value of a coupling cap to an appropriate value, for a low pass you need to add a series R, alnong with a cap shunted to ground. No op-amps, no extra stages. dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LR 4th order vs LR 8th order crossover | redliner | Subwoofers | 1 | 7th January 2009 11:32 PM |
| 1st order Passive Line Level Crossover + 2nd order Highpass? | alexclaber | Multi-Way | 11 | 4th January 2008 07:15 PM |
| Another 2nd/4th-order L-R active crossover | johnf | Solid State | 6 | 7th April 2005 10:16 AM |
| 1st and 2nd Order Crossover Design | rookster | Multi-Way | 16 | 11th May 2003 05:36 PM |
| Crossover - 1st Order | GeniX | Multi-Way | 3 | 20th September 2002 02:39 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11588 seconds (76.63% PHP - 23.37% MySQL) with 11 queries |