|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
|
Hello there,
I refer to the Dynaudio Confidence C1 speaker. This speaker has an inverted driver array, with the woofer on top, tweeter on the bottom. As a result, the technical description states that this driver configuration "creates an upward polar tilt due to the distance of the voice coils to the baffle, emulating the effect of a sloped baffle while providing a much larger sonic window than would otherwise be possible" and thus implies the speaker is time-aligned. Basically, is this possible? If so, what are the technical reasons behind this? I do note that Dynaudio always uses 1st order crossovers in their speakers. I'm very curious. Thank you, Mal |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Basically, what's happening is that the woofer is now on the horizontal listening axis. Hence the woofer to listener distance is shorter than the tweeter to listener, and that compensates for the location of the woofer's voicecoil (which lies a cm or so behind the baffle).
It's a valid method in theory. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
|
Hi David,
Thanks for the reply! How does this work... why does swapping the drivers around make the woofer's acoustic centre shorter in distance to the listener? Since the frequencies produced by the tweeter still travel faster than those of the woofer? Thanks, Mal |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
All frequencies travel at the same speed - 330 m/s.
A woofer has greater depth and it's voicecoil is usually located a cm or 2 behind the baffle (more in bigger woofers). A tweeter on the other hand has it's voicecoil very close to it's baffle surface. The acoustic centre (apparent source of sound) is approx the voicecoil of the driver, hence sound from the woofer has to travel that little bit further than that from the tweeter., to reach the listener's ears. So if you put the woofer directly on axis, and the tweeter 5-10 deg or so off axis, the tweeter is slightly further away and can compensate for it's shallower voicecoil. Hope that's clearer. David www.gattiweb.com |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Holland, The Hague
|
However the difference is quite small.
Using Phytagoras. If L is the distance of the listener to the baffle (with a 90 degree angle) and the center of woofer and tweeter (in the plain of the baffle) are d apart, than the difference in distance to the tweeter is square root(L^2 + d^2) - L (in the plain of the baffle) eg with L= 300 cm and d=15 cm the difference would be 0.375 cm. So the woofer can have an acoustic center 0.375 cm deeper than the tweeter. With a greater listening distance (eg 4 meter) the effect would be even more neglectable
__________________
Is that all there is? |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
|
I think the real reason is that odd-order crossovers cause a (15 degree, if I remember for 3rd order) tilt in the polar axis due to the phase induced delay. This tilt is downwards for the usual driver configuration. By inverting the drivers and spacing them correctly you can compensate for the tilt in the crossover.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Norway, -north of the moral circle..
|
The usual assumtion has been to assume the start of the wave to beappx 2/3 into the woofer cone, rather than at the voice coil.
More important though is the inherent time delay or phase shift that occurs in all high pass sections. Even using the socalled linear phase X-overs, ( or fill-in driver ) , this delay will be present in all the high pass sections used. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Bangalore, India
|
First order crossover, phase shift etc., are O.K. But beware, unlike Dynaudio's designs, this configuration will not sound good with all drivers - reason - "Offaxis response" of tweeters are usually bad. Hence, imaging will suffer and your sweet spot becomes narrower.
__________________
Sam |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Newcastle, Australia
|
Went down this road a while back and here's the thread.
Time Alignment on a flat baffle..... How much is an ego trip and how much is actually a sound improvement, who knows, but I'm happy with the results It is quite common for the inverted drivers to be used with odd order crossovers and there's a reference to that in the LSDCookbook. Cheers |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
|
Quote:
could you tell us more about this?
__________________
Just remember: in theory there's no difference between theory and practice. But in practice it usually is quite a bit difference... Bob Pease |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BSC, sloped baffle? | PeteMcK | Multi-Way | 1 | 2nd July 2009 02:43 AM |
| 1st or second order crossover for sloped baffle | fin1bxn | Multi-Way | 5 | 15th September 2008 07:17 PM |
| Sloped Mid-bass' | Ed LaFontaine | Multi-Way | 13 | 1st January 2006 10:40 PM |
| Does sloped baffle affect X.O. | dvdwmth | Multi-Way | 3 | 3rd June 2004 09:47 PM |
| crossover changes for a sloped baffle? | Jim85IROC | Multi-Way | 5 | 17th March 2004 02:06 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10160 seconds (82.21% PHP - 17.79% MySQL) with 10 queries |