|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Copenhagen
|
Hi
Does anybody have the diagrams for the different versions of the B&W 801 (or the 802) models. Would like to compare the differences between the different versions, starting with the original 801, then 801 matrix, 801 series 2, 801 jub. and finally 801.3 - would be interesting to see the development, especially since the drivers basically remainded the same (except from the tweeter) |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Indiana
|
No crossovers schematics here..
But I know they lost the protction circuitry in S2/S3. Also used larger ferrite Inductors in S3 vs. aircore in series 80. I own 801/80 and 801/S3.... I like the 801/80 better... but the S3 plays more louder... |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Copenhagen
|
K-Amps
Funny, have the same experience - I think the closed box version of the 80 has something to do with it - allthough the tweeter of the s2/s3 model, is imho, better. However the 80 model did actually exist in at least two models - one with APOC (protection circuit with battery) and one without. The reason I really would like to see all schematics side by side, is to try and understand the evolution and what parts make what differences. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Indiana
|
Mine was the later generation Series 80 (not series F) without the battery. Also mine did not have the hood etc.
I recall somewhere in the S3 that they tried to reduce component count for purity of signal.... that tells me the S2 probably has a flatter response (i.e. more tailored). I guess I am one of the few that like the earlier tweeter... maybe because I have a Hafler DH-500 driving the S3 and a Krell driving teh 80. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Copenhagen
|
Sounds like the same model as I have. In regards to the crossovers I only have to compare (visually) the S3 to my 80 (have both) and there is a HUGE difference. Not only in the number of components, but also layout etc.
I think there is something to be learned here if one ever wants to build crossovers for a diy project. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Copenhagen
|
Forgot - I have actually changed the tweeters on my 80's to series 3 types. Worth while, in my oppinion..
Also, not to get carried away from the topic, but you should really exchange the speaker binding post to a better quality - the ones installed from B&W are the worst piece of %&%¤¤ I have ever seen. This applies to all the models 80 to S3 |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Connection Diagram for ESX 600.5 | JoergST | Car Audio | 0 | 31st August 2006 07:32 PM |
| Can someone look at this diagram for me? | warnsey | Full Range | 5 | 31st May 2006 01:21 AM |
| Diagram STK407-090 | panterka | Chip Amps | 1 | 24th April 2006 06:24 AM |
| Schematic diagram | Matthewong | Pass Labs | 29 | 12th August 2005 03:39 PM |
| Diagram of B&W CM2 | klitgt | Multi-Way | 0 | 28th November 2004 08:38 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10241 seconds (76.61% PHP - 23.39% MySQL) with 10 queries |