|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Montreal
|
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction regarding open baffle nearfields. Most of the OB stuff I've seen here or elsewhere on the net is HUGE! I would like to experiment with nearfields based around a 4 or 5 inch driver. The general purpose would be to compliment my current studio monitors: Yamaha NS10M and Auratones. Neither of these are great speakers, I know, but they are highly useful for mixing. Essentially, I am in search of transparency (who isn't I guess.) My thought is that since microphones are not housed in resonant boxes, neither should speakers. Any links, thoughts, suggestions...? I appreciate it! Brian |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Racine, Wisconsin
|
All I can tell you is that my current speakers are OB line arrays using the PE NSB's that are discussed widely on the net. I never listened to OB's before building these. By contrast, I think it would be very hard to go back to the "box" sound. Comparitively, the sound seems much cleaner and, obviously, a lot less boomy.
I use Tuba 18's (rolled up horn) on the bottom ~ <180Hz. These are boxed, but they are vastly different than the standard band pass and vented dreck. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi Brian,
I have two sets of OB's that I use in the nearfield at my desk. Maybe you'll be lucky and not have to have a computer monitor in front of you acting like a black hole. With one set I use a Fostex FE206E with a 10" realistic driver for bass support. The other is just a Fostex FE127E. With the 206 I can run without a sub, but the 127 needs one or at least a helper woofer. Baffle size is really something you have to experiment with because there are just too many variables, but in the nearfield you don't need big baffles and cardboard makes experimentation easy. If you can integrate a sub into the picture, then quite small baffles can work great.
__________________
Everyone has a photographic memory. It's just that most are out of film. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Does open baffle suffer from baffle step? | 454Casull | Multi-Way | 15 | 19th May 2012 03:12 PM |
| Open-baffle baffle length | matejS | Multi-Way | 2 | 21st September 2010 04:49 PM |
| Murphy baffle radios [ open baffle ] | keithpeter | Full Range | 10 | 11th September 2007 07:59 PM |
| what effect does baffle have on open-baffle system? | kappa546 | Multi-Way | 6 | 24th January 2006 10:21 PM |
| Australians- what solid timbers for baffle? (open baffle loudspeaker) | tktran | Multi-Way | 13 | 29th November 2004 11:09 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07678 seconds (69.89% PHP - 30.11% MySQL) with 10 queries |