|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: .
|
I`m starting to plan a new speakers system and I will start from the midrange up, which should cover the range from 300 to 5k at least (perhaps in a front horn). These are the candidates
Audax pr17mo PHL 1120 B&C 6pe13, 6pev13, 6xt13, 8pe21, 8pl21 Beyma 6ml90 Fostex f85k, 126, 166, 206 my room is about 20m2 and the the speakers should be able to play at realistic levels. Im looking for quality, detail, dynamics, excelent voice reproduction (female!). Below I`ll have dipole subs, and a slot tweeter (probably a beyma) on top. I appriciate any commets |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Why did you skip the 4" Fostex drivers?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
Especially since it's the same price as the 206 and there's no concern with the bass response. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
Quote:
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
||
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
|
Have you guys ever used one of the smaller Fostex in a front horn? I would have thought they would be ideal, but none of them seem to have a mass corner (2*Fs/Qts) that is much better than normal hi-fi drivers (ie 400-500Hz). Now, I guess that doesn't mean they won't work, but it means you'll have to do some work to get them flat, and that you'll be giving away much of the efficiency that horn-loading can provide.
However, front horns don't seem to be an exact science in many cases, so maybe they will work better than it would appear from the numbers. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
Greets!
Keep in mind that the higher the mass corner, the more loading is required for a given Fc, ergo greater distortion/HF BW attenuation, so for horn loading a really wide BW FR driver a low effective mass corner is your friend. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
|
Aw, geez GM why'd you go and do that. I'm crusing along just fine and you put a stick in my spokes and confuse me. I think you're getting at the crux of a question that I've been wondering about though - exactly how does the mass corner operate?
My understanding of mass corner is that it represents a first-order pole above which total power output from the driver falls at 6dB/octave. I've always assumed that in free space, this was more or less compensated for by falling directivity, keeping the on-axis response flat up to a much higher freq. However, when constrained by a CD horn, you dont get the same collapsing directivity, so you see the on-axis response fall above the mass corner. So, are you saying that with a mid-horn it's better to take the low mass corner and use eq to achieve flat response, since it results in lower distortion? Or are you saying that I have no clue what I'm talking about, and have to go read more? |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Republik of Kalifonia
|
Low Q, designed for BLH's, BUT, has anyone used the 108 in a simple BR, sealed, or aperiodic design?
Abit off topic, but a great driver to be sure.
__________________
"Pilau Buggah, Big Islan Mo Betta!!" |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: .
|
Im fallinng asleep now, but I reply shortly.
Yes I skipped the 108, and it might indeed be a very good candidate. I have not heard a sigma yet. I listed mostly larger drivers because I am concernd about the not so good dynamics of the smaller ones. I also like the fact that the larger drivers are up to 11dB more efficient. Two questions: Do you feel the 108 is (as mid) better that the other fostex drivers I mentioned? From the others the audax really tempts me. I have been reading that it is really dificullt even to get a DR mid horn from 300 up to 3K. Any comments? I like the controlled directivity of a horn. Would this be the case with a waveguide? Thats something I would have to start reading about. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 3 way using ATC midrange | tech.knockout | Multi-Way | 49 | 30th April 2010 11:04 AM |
| jbl pro midrange | lt cdr data | Multi-Way | 1 | 6th February 2007 07:08 AM |
| Which midrange to go up to 5 KHz? | esl | Multi-Way | 7 | 24th September 2003 01:27 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12514 seconds (78.99% PHP - 21.01% MySQL) with 10 queries |