|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Connecticut
|
I'm looking for a little imput on how best to utilize my Bose 402 loudspeakers. I ended up with a nice pair that I got for free and have been using them as rear surround speakers.
My question has to do with the active equalizer that bose seems to require in order to get the best sound. I have a yamaha receiver that does the auto configure and equalization thing for the whole room and it seems to do a pretty good job. Should I invest in the active equalizer for the surround speakers speakers instead of using the parametric equalizer of the reciever? Do you think I'm missing out on much by not using the actrive eq? I would also be interested in knowing what the bose active eq is really doing to add the life into their speaker system. As a side note, I've read a few threads where some folks don't seem to be too keen on bose speakers so I am aware of those opinions. Since I got them for free I can't complain too much. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Canada
|
"The Panaray system digital controller utilizes a digital signal processing (DSP) architecture to provide smooth, accurate spectral response for the 402 Basic Speaker System. Programable limiting protects your system and push-button control allows easy selection of loudspeaker equalization.
From bose.com - search on 402. I'd say try 'em without the controller. If they suck, I'm sure someone could recommend a 4.5" Tang Band or other full range driver. Cheers, dooper |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Silicon Valley
|
Quote:
__________________
Davy Jones |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eugene, OR
|
or
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
|
Hi urlooney
If you like them, keep them. Though there are much better speakers around, they certainly ain't free! From past experience with 402s, you need about a 3dB boost below 120, a 3dB cut around 1.2K with a width of about an octave, and a 3dB boost above about 10K. However, if 402s fetch a decent price on eBay I would just sell them, rather than spending money improving them...
__________________
Al I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Active modules for 2-way loudspeakers? | roffe | Multi-Way | 13 | 5th January 2009 08:21 AM |
| non-isolated amplifiers for active loudspeakers | Davey T | Class D | 8 | 29th October 2008 09:50 PM |
| Amp for active loudspeakers | Nm2285 | Multi-Way | 4 | 13th November 2007 08:43 PM |
| Electronics For Active Loudspeakers | sdclc126 | Multi-Way | 15 | 24th January 2005 06:30 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08553 seconds (71.22% PHP - 28.78% MySQL) with 11 queries |