|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
What is the appropriate measurement range (in G) for measuring the vibration of enclosure panels?
I am thinking it would be very easy to use the output of an analog accelerometer as the "mic" input to Speaker Workshop. Since these accelerometers are not very expensive, I think it would be a great capability to have. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
First, I note that I just use an uncalibrated piece of PVDF- its low mass means that it won't perturb the measurement much and it has outstanding frequency response.
Second, if you have a feel for the max displacement and frequency, the g force is pretty easy to calculate. I can run through that if you don't know it already.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
Unfortunately, I really have no idea how much the average panel moves in absolute terms, although I have a wealth of data from magazine reviews on the frequencies at which they tend to resonate. If you could just give me some idea, it would be most appreciated. I just want to know if we are talking 0-10G, 0-2G, or something much smaller.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
If I had to guess (and this is a guess), it would be larger, if anything. Acceleration goes as the square of the frequency.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
I guess, I was thinking that 100G sensors are used on subs that have 1" or so of movement at 100Hz. I guess we need almost the same amount of dynamic range if the wall moves 1 mil at 3kHz. A big "if" thouhg since I have no idea.
I did an experiment last night where I touched the measurement mic to the panel and did a MLS pulse. I found a peak in both the FR and the waterfall that seemed to correspond to the longitudinal resonance of the panel. It was interesting, but I have to assume this is a poor technique. There is no way to remove acoustic contamination, although the nearfield special case certainly applies. Perhaps a reasonable technique if done outdoors? Everything after the initial pulse should be resonance... |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Croatia
|
Quote:
I'm now working on a couple of experiments with ACH 01 accelerometer. It is also very usable in panel vibration measurements. You can find some application data at http://www.libinst.com/accel.htm Regards, Milan |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Planet Earth
|
Someone over on the Mad board was using an accelerometer from Digikey with good results.
http://dkc3.digikey.com/PDF/T051/1460.pdf I think, but I'm not sure, it was the first one listed, ACH-01-03. The post has dropped out of the archives. Anyway, that looks like a good one with 2 Hz to 20 kHz response and 10mv/G sensitivity which should let you measure down to a small fraction of a G with most mic preamps. The max dynamic range is +/-150 G. Edit: ah, I see that's the same one moamps is using. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
Great suggestion!
Thanks.It looks easily adaptable to phantom-powered mic input. Even better. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: SouthEast
|
I suggest an accelerometer somewhere in the 50G range. The goal should obviously be to use the accelerometer to document changes as you try different damping/stiffening techniques, so if you start "out of range" or clipping you know you've improved when you move into linear sensor territory.
I also suggest starting with a simple tap test on the panel and a fourier transform analysis of the resulting impulse response. No need to input any sort of white noise signal with MLS techniques... a true impulse (or close enough for our goals) is easy enough in this case to generate by hand. Just a sharp blow with a hard object, measure, transform, and there is your resonant frequency. That analysis will help identify appropriate stiffening and damping measures, and will tell you when you've moved the Fn and also when you've reduced its peak amplitude. If you want to get more serious, I suggest displaying data in a shock spectra format (velocity vs. frequency) wiith G-level isolines running at angles. This type of data presentation is extremely helpful in directing efforts at problem areas. |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bavaria (south of veal sausage equator)
|
Quote:
scanned from the Brüel & Kjaer book "Piezoelectric Accelerometers and Vibration Preamplifiers" a note to the graph: acceleration is not nominated in g but in m/s^2 1g = 9,81 m/s^2 example: a panel that displace 0,01mm at 1000Hz (I think this would be a more or less realistic value) is accelerated by (about) 400 m/s^2 = 41g
__________________
Christoph STEAL the BEST - INVENT the REST |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Laser Instead of an Accelerometer? Is it possible ? | jsa_ind | Multi-Way | 53 | 20th December 2009 09:55 PM |
| Capacitor vibration ? | ]|[ GorE | Multi-Way | 2 | 26th March 2007 10:26 PM |
| tube vibration | smak | Tubes / Valves | 8 | 19th January 2006 05:25 PM |
| Vibration Control for UcD 700 | serengetiplains | Class D | 9 | 4th January 2006 05:56 AM |
| Major Vibration | Phrozen06 | Car Audio | 4 | 18th August 2005 02:36 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09809 seconds (88.32% PHP - 11.68% MySQL) with 11 queries |