position and clearance of port in a MLQWT design - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th February 2005, 01:18 PM   #1
Puggie is offline Puggie  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Default position and clearance of port in a MLQWT design

I've have a set of MLTQW cabinets modeled from the MJK mathcad sheets using the Audax 4 1/2" units from Maplin. My question relates to port positioning and clearance. I'm planning on using about a 2" diameter port (about 5" long).

Does the port have to be at the end of the line or can I position it part way along the line? how will theis affect things?

How much clearance do I need around either end of the port? I would have liked to put the cabinet on long (18-20mm) spikes and fire the port downwards out of the bottom of the cabinet, would the close proximity of the floor affect things (reflections or air resistance) a single 4 1/2" driver is not going to move air very fast down a 2" port.

Thanks people.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2005, 12:32 PM   #2
Puggie is offline Puggie  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Anyone????

I have a completed cabinet and holesaw ready???
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2005, 01:27 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Blackstone VA
I have a pair of MLTQW units using 4" drivers in a bipolar config. The drivers are centered in the cabinets and the port is 3" from the bottom of the cabinet which sits upon the woofer enclosure. I prefer the port facing backwards. Can't give you the science behind this but it sounds good. If you need more info you might try contacting MJK directly he has always responded quickly to my inquiries. Hope this helps.

Pete
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2005, 01:34 PM   #4
diyAudio Moderator
 
pinkmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
Hi puggie.

I must admit, I am not that familar with the MLTQW design. I suspect though that the port is loading/terminating the TL, and so at the end is probably best. You might get away with a downfiring port, but depending on the height from the floor you might need to fiddle with the length a little.
__________________
Rick: Oh Cliff / Sometimes it must be difficult not to feel as if / You really are a cliff / when fascists keep trying to push you over it! / Are they the lemmings / Or are you, Cliff? / Or are you Cliff?
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2005, 02:56 PM   #5
GM is offline GM  United States
diyAudio Member
 
GM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
Assuming you used the ML-TQWT WS and not the PORTED, then the assumption is a bottom firing vent WRT 1/4WL action, but for ease of programming it assumes that both the driver and vent are radiating from the same point so the sim loses accuracy with increasing frequency, and why the PORTED is more accurate overall.

That said, I prefer boundary loading the vent to maximze gain, so either a bottom firing or near/at the bottom if front or rear positioned, but then I tend to mount the driver in its optimum position along the line. For designs where the driver is near/at the top, moving the vent up somewhat will smooth it out somewhat at the expense of max vent loading.

Anyway, the way I calc bottom firing spacing for a vent, a worst case scenario is where the bottom of the cab has an area based on the vent's diameter, so for a 2" dia. vent, a minimum spacing of a whopping 0.35" is required, with larger bottom areas requiring progressively less before slot loading begins in earnest.

GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2005, 06:47 PM   #6
Puggie is offline Puggie  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Thanks people, I'll either fire the port out of the base or out of the back of the cabinet as low as I can.

I'll have a play with the ported Mathcad work sheet this evening too.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Port in non-optimal position ? RobWells Subwoofers 9 25th July 2009 11:51 PM
Woofer and port position DragonMaster Multi-Way 2 13th September 2008 11:18 PM
TL port position cs Multi-Way 2 20th October 2006 02:21 PM
Port position on Bass cab Gubbe Instruments and Amps 1 17th February 2006 04:40 PM
Port position? MisterB Multi-Way 3 20th February 2002 04:42 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:19 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2