|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Los Angeles
|
Do you think this would be helpful in speaker design? Or is there such a device out there already?
How about if there is a DSP instrument which can emulate most type of filters that would usually go into the xover? The software would allow you to sellect different type of filter. Think of it as a black box active xover that sits between your preamp or cdp and the amplifier. The output of the amplifier would then be connected straight to the driver without going to a xover. During the designing process, instead of designing the xover from various discrete parts, you can play with the DSP black box and fine-tune the filters on-the-flight through a GUI from a computer. This blackbox DSP for example would have 3 outputs per channel: one for tweeter, one for midrange, and one for the woofer. Each output is independent of each other and can have its own filter. As for input, it would have a digital input to interface directly to the digital output of the transport. It would also have an analog input so that you can connect it to a preamp. Of course this would only help at the initial stage to give you some idea how each drivers would behave roughly. You still have to deal with other effect of a real xover and how they all interact with the amp and all that such as having a conjugate load or a zobel network. One way is to have the conjugate load or zobel network but the filter will be implemented on the DSP box. You then would just sit at your computer and play with different type of filter. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Ontario
|
What you've described is part of the emulation software within LSPCad 6.
I haven't used it yet, so I can't comment on how well it works or how easy it is to use. Paul |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
Sounds like a Behringer DCX2496
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Or a Soundblaster Live! running with kX drivers
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pickering, Ontario
|
Kxproject !
(caution: you may never finish the passive crossovers
__________________
Benford's law of controversy - Passion is inversely proportional to the amount of real information available. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
|
Quote:
Certainly does. I never moved on to 'custom built active xo's' after using this item. (would of been op-amp based if I'd gone there btw) Rob |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
|
Quote:
Quote:
I've been contemplating a DCX2496 for the horns I'm playing with, but it's a bit expensive over here, and a cheap, ie the cost of an SB card, project is intriquing. If I could get it to work to my satisfaction with this, cheaply, then the DCX may be a worthwhile purchase. |
||
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Editor
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: San Francisco, USA
|
I see the Behringer DCX2496 online some places now for $250!!
now that's cheap! Either a new model coming out , or they have made so many that their unit cost has plunged! |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pickering, Ontario
|
Variac, they have mastered the art of China-procurement.
Brett, I will answer any questions that I able able to, but please search for and read my other posts first, there is some kxproject information in them already Some recommendations to keep in mind -- - it's possible to purchase a wrong soundblaster card, do homework first! - practice on woofers first -it's possible to kill tweeters and compression drivers with low freqs, always check your setup and use a cap. to protect them. - to avoid loud surprises, run the computer audio at maximum non-clipping levels and set your pwramp levels externally - current version is 3537, don't get 3538 yet, is beta. - get the ufx plugins for 3537 - I have the simple delay plugin if you can't find it, ask and I'll mail it Cheers, Dave
__________________
Benford's law of controversy - Passion is inversely proportional to the amount of real information available. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
Wow, the DCX is now cheaper than the DEQ!
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Linear voltage regulator: how to make good use of "sense" and "ground sense"? | NeoY2k | Analog Line Level | 7 | 6th September 2008 11:35 PM |
| TL, does this now make sense? | Madmike2 | Multi-Way | 2 | 8th May 2005 02:39 PM |
| Does this make sense ? | 00940 | Solid State | 7 | 27th March 2004 09:29 PM |
| does this make sense? | nosegoblin | Solid State | 9 | 14th February 2004 02:19 PM |
| Does this make sense? | Illusus | Chip Amps | 11 | 25th September 2003 01:59 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10663 seconds (79.82% PHP - 20.18% MySQL) with 11 queries |