Why XLS not SLS? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th February 2005, 03:34 PM   #1
Jennice is offline Jennice  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Default Why XLS not SLS?

I know that the Peerless XLS' are great air movers... big, and long displacement.

However, I've tried to model a box with WinISD. Just like their application notes conclude, a 6th order bandpass or passive radiator is the only way of getting these to work below 40 Hz.

With intended use for a sub below maybe 80 Hz, there's not much point in having this driver, if it's impossible for ordinary people to build a good sub-woofer with.
also, if going for vented, the port will need to be HUGE!

Even so, the XLS seem to be designed to work with massive amplifiers (400W in their application note), and equalized to obtain decent performance.

The SLS, by comparison, rolls off much lower than the XLS in the same 150 liter (!) cabinet, without active EQ'ing.

Thus, I am considering an array of 4 SLS' (2 in series, 2 of these sets in parallel), as building a box seems much easier for real life people.

Can anyone tell me a success-story with XLS subs, and how they build them?


Jennice
__________________
I get paid to break stuff. My g/f gets paid to play with children. Life is good.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2005, 03:41 PM   #2
tiroth is offline tiroth  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
You've already stated why, it's because it is designed to be used with the matching passive radiator. I think many "ordinary people" have built subs this way.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2005, 03:46 PM   #3
Vikash is offline Vikash  United Kingdom
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
Vikash's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: UK
You're probably right that it is not as easy in application as the SLS. But add a PR, or EQ in sealed enclosure and it gives results, not to mention its low distortion levels. Also, there are now a new range available, XXLS I think, with different T/S and will give you more options in the modeling sense.

Not interested in using a PR? http://www.vikash.info/audio/xls10/
__________________
"The human mind is so constituted that it colours with its own previous conceptions any new notion that presents itself for acceptance." - J. Wilhelm. (But I still think mine sounds better than yours.)
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th February 2005, 04:16 PM   #4
Jennice is offline Jennice  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Yes, I've just seen the XXLS drivers, and modeled with one of them.

THEY ROCK ! ! ! ! ! !
__________________
I get paid to break stuff. My g/f gets paid to play with children. Life is good.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:29 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2