|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi all
I'm considering Monacor as my first option for my second loudspeaker project (used Visaton for the first one). The second option is to buid a horn with a FR driver, as a result of constant pressure from a friend Requirements: 1. An F3 point of at least 45 Hz, less wouldn't hurt. 2. At least some dynamics and definition. This is where I'm unsatisfied with my first project. 3. Budget: 400 EURO maximum. If someone had some experience to share about Monacor it would be great.
__________________
"This site gives off very confusing signals, one minute highly technical discussions that leave the truly interested learners wallowing in their own stupidity and the next finds it endlessly repeating old wives tales and cockeyed theories as fact." |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Germany
|
Hi,
if I remember you had 2 real nice chassis from Visaton W170S and G20. I´d guess your disappointment is more due to the enclosure than anything else. You gotta remember that it´s not only the chassis that makes the sound. And that might be even a big understatement. What did you end up enclosure-wise? Have you tried different ones? Even if it was only to prove yourself wrong, build something "recommended" for the two and I´d guess you´ll be happy then. (If you have problems reading through a thread at the Visaton-forum let me know.) greets PS.: Quote:
__________________
jens |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Just to rest assured I put some books in one enclosure to compensate for those 12 liters and I made some comparisons with the other box. I decided that the difference does not worth the effort to undergo surgery with the boxes. Above all, I measured the parameters of the drivers and one of them was pretty far from the Visaton specs. I don't remember the exact figures (I have them at home), but I recall precisely that Fs was 42 Hz instead of 36Hz as Visaton says. The other had a 37 or 38Hz Fs. I haven't measured Vas but you can imagine that probably things wouldn't look too good there either. As a matter of fact I could feel that one of the woofers had a clearly softer suspension just by pressing with the hand on the cone. And this was prior to any break-in! I thing that after break-in and around 1 month of use I can feel the difference even better: the enclosure that has the driver with the bigger Fs sounds different, obviously less bass. But enough about a 37 euro paper cone woofer. The thing is that I'm thinking about looking into kevlar or aluminium. Maybe AL170 or the much praised Monacor SPH-165KEP ( http://www.shop3000.de/product_info....oducts_id=3003 ). I asked about mating the AL170 with the G20SC (something similar with the VIB 170 AL but with different tweeter) on the Visaton forum but someone said they can't work together too well (no explanation). This should work OK with my enclouses since the VIB 170 AL is around 40l, if I manage to design a filter for the AL170/G20SC combination. Bottom line is: what disappoints me isn't the bass, but the midrange. There's no detail, no dynamics. When I expect the sound to strike me, it remains dull and boring.
__________________
"This site gives off very confusing signals, one minute highly technical discussions that leave the truly interested learners wallowing in their own stupidity and the next finds it endlessly repeating old wives tales and cockeyed theories as fact." |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Zagreb
|
I think G20sc deserves much better bassmidrange than w170s is. Try Monacor SPH-176 it is round 45 euros. Another good one could be SPH-170. SPH-165 KEP should be even better but it requires smaller box of 15-20 litres.In a classic BR it could give F3 of 45 Hz
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi Tomac
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"This site gives off very confusing signals, one minute highly technical discussions that leave the truly interested learners wallowing in their own stupidity and the next finds it endlessly repeating old wives tales and cockeyed theories as fact." |
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
From spanish site: www.matrixhifi.com
http://www.matrixhifi.com/foro/viewt...8d150b1ba55b61 Sorry for the poor translation... "All models "KEP" of Monacor although are very good, they have a little construction problem, reason why I have had to unscrew the dispersion nose and put a folio coiled three times between the nucleus and the coil so that it left this affluent nose centered and does not graze. Then it goes well. All the models of kevlar of Monacor are "soft", nonrigid and therefore they hardly do not have resonance tip towards los3 khz. In addition they annul that tip and the distortion by a second small magnet in the central nucleus |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Close too Lillehammer
|
Buildt a couple of ported bookshelf speakers a few years ago, with the SPH 135 KEP drivers.
Altougth the bass and midrange was very good for the size, i goofed up big time by going for the visually matching Focal TC 90 kevlar tweeter. It was virtually impossible too get those tweeters sound natural and smooth in my livingroom I ended up selling them too a friend who had a living room with heavy curtains and wall to wall carpet. there they worked great |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London
|
I use the Monacor SPH-130AL full range in a 20 litre ported box. There's no stuffing in the box, which is heavy and assymetrical. Port is 6mm x 11mm on front. It's not perfect but I haven't got around to changing it because it's a simple solution and covers most of the frequency range. No deep bass, but satisfactory bass down to about 40hz. Top end is a bit uneven but it has good extension for its size. The detail and soundstage is excellent. Obviously I'd like to make a good crossover which would cross up to a Decca ribbon or other ribbon. Any suggestions welcome.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| BIB or TL with Monacor SPH-170 and DT-254? | jaste | Full Range | 0 | 30th October 2008 01:36 PM |
| Monacor sph-135/AD | Tomac | Multi-Way | 22 | 30th August 2006 04:30 PM |
| Monacor MSH-115 (116) | Michail Bugaria | Multi-Way | 5 | 16th May 2006 07:45 AM |
| Monacor | Vedo | Multi-Way | 2 | 10th February 2005 09:31 PM |
| Monacor SPH 130 AL - anyone? | andyjevans | Multi-Way | 10 | 8th December 2004 01:43 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12864 seconds (80.43% PHP - 19.57% MySQL) with 11 queries |