|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: knoxville tn
|
Hi,
Beginner question: I will use the bass in an enclosure but keep the midrange and tweeter seperate. The question is how important is it to kill the radiation of the midrange (~500-5000 Hz) from its back? Since these units usually have sealed backs, can I mount them on a thick piece of cardboard? And the same question for the tweeter. Thanks a lot. Cheeres, Murat |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
You must deal with the back wave from all drivers, although since most tweeters are sealed back you can potentially ignore them.
How you deal with the back wave (sealed, aperiodic, TL, open baffle) will determine the response and radiation pattern. Midrange and tweeter lend themselves more easily to OB because the size requirements scale inversely with low frequency cutoff. The simplest design would be to seal the midrange. I don't know what cardboard has to do with anything; you can build your speakers from aluminum or pasta or whatever you want, but there are obviously some tradeoffs in cost, strength, damping, etc. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: home sweet home
|
if you only need to cover 500-5k on midrange it helps to put in on open baffle, baffle does not need to be that big
there are many threads and sites about this sound is less constrained that is my experience |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: home sweet home
|
Quote:
and they will sound like it too! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: knoxville tn
|
[QUOTE]the size requirements scale inversely with low frequency cutoff.
Yes, that is why I was thinking of cardboard for midrange and tweeter only. Not for the bass. The midrange will need much smaller mechanical damping compared to bass. As the the sealed back of midrange also takes care of back radiation greatly, then, what is wrong with a thick cardboard? If I am not wrong as a baffle it will deal with the diffraction at the boudaries of the speker so it is necessary otherwise I would even skip it. Can one see what is wrong with this picture?? |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
|
Quote:
murat - what you're describing is an open baffle speaker, which is quite different from a sealed-box speaker. For one, you don't have to deal with internal damping or bracing, which makes it much simpler to design and build. Two, the backwave of the driver won't come through the cone and possibly color the sound in some way. Three, the baffle vibrations will have a much smaller impact on the sound than the vibrations of the walls of a box. Four, the size of the baffle determines the point at which dipole cancellation (6dB/octave, IIRC) occurs, and a larger baffle will lower the rolloff point. Five, the positioning of a dipole speaker isn't the same as doing it for a monopole (non-dipole) speaker. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
|
I only know of one sealed back mid range speaker. Nearly all of them are open backed.
Rob |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
|
Quote:
Yes - Isn't he ? ""As the the sealed back of midrange also takes care of back radiation greatly, then, what is wrong with a thick cardboard? If I am not wrong as a baffle it will deal with the diffraction at the boudaries of the speker so it is necessary otherwise I would even skip it"" Rob |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: home sweet home
|
there is some terminology misunderstanding
you guys have to distinguish if you are discusing the driver or the enclosure some midranges come with closed back, so called cup, which is designed to limit low frequency response of the midrange driver and make 3 way box construction much easier in this case it does not matter if placed on open baffle enclosure or into small closed box, frequency response would be the same offcourse the shape of baffle/enclosure would influence fr response in part.... |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Plastic mid/tweeter enclosures? | trunkmonkey | Multi-Way | 5 | 19th January 2006 11:11 PM |
| Any thoughts on midrange enclosures? | tcpip | Multi-Way | 20 | 4th November 2005 09:35 AM |
| fullaranger as midrange, and plastic enclosures | lufbramatt | Multi-Way | 24 | 17th October 2005 07:16 AM |
| tube tweeter enclosures? | jazzbearz | Multi-Way | 6 | 19th January 2005 09:27 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12498 seconds (77.95% PHP - 22.05% MySQL) with 11 queries |