|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Small Town in Minnesota
|
I recently finished my first speaker project using two of the vifa TC11MG's in series with an older 1 inch dome tweet from radio shack that I had laying around MTM arrangement (cheap was the keyword). The crossover was designed as a LR 2nd order at 3500. Well it sounded so good (6.5 liter box ported at 95hz) that instead of using them as boombox speakers I used them as front L/R of my home stereo(with passive Klipsch sub xo at 145Hz). They sounded great until the radio shack tweets started to show their past abuses from being used in a very crude pickup stereo setup.
I would appreciate anyone's opinions about a good replacement tweet around or less than 20 bucks a piece that you think would work well with those vifa drivers. If it means changing crossover parameters I am willing to do that also. This speaker building has become addictive, my wife thinks I'm nuts, but I can hear some honking in the tweeter response and I must deal with it or it will drive me nuts. The old tweets were rated at 8 ohms. I now see the value of building a well designed kit before under taking a design of my own |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
At a glance, and not knowing anything about the one it will replace: http://www.partsexpress.com/pe/pshow...=264-524&DID=7
GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Small Town in Minnesota
|
Thanks GM, I see that that tweeter is rated as 6 ohms where the Radio shack tweet was 8 ohms. Can you explain what will happen to the crossover point(currently designed for 3500Hz @8 ohm load) if I add that tweeter without changing component values in the x-over. Aslo if I have two drivers spl( @88db/1w) in series does that mean I now have a spl of 91db/1w. So a tweeter rated at 91db wouldn't need to be padded?
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chamblee, Ga.
|
You're welcome!
I imagine it will shift the XO point/slope enough to be audible, so a new HF XO design may be required. It's easier for me to consider multiple driver pairings, level matching, etc., issues from a voltage POV, so using a calc'd eff. from some measured specs: 88.76dB/W = V = SQRT (1*8) = 88.76dB/~2.83V, but these are nominally 4 ohms, so 10*log10(8/4) = ~3.01 + 88.76 = ~91.77dB/~2.83V, then two in series would = +3dB for doubling of acoustic pressure and 10*log10(8/8) = 0dB for a net ~91.77dB/2.83V. Since the tweeter is rated 93.5dB/2.83V, it will need padding. GM
__________________
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Small Town in Minnesota
|
I knew I should have paid closer attention in Trig/Calc class! I'm with you until the logrithmic function. I better dig out the old books because I want to know the reasons behind the calculations. Thanks again, I am really enjoying this learning process!
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Design of a TL for Vifa P17WJ | 00940 | Multi-Way | 24 | 7th September 2009 05:20 AM |
| Newbie, Line array questions with TC11MG Vifa and TB 25 | RAAMaudio | Multi-Way | 10 | 18th December 2004 03:10 PM |
| Please assist with a Vifa design | amo | Multi-Way | 25 | 14th October 2004 11:22 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07866 seconds (72.28% PHP - 27.72% MySQL) with 10 queries |