Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th January 2005, 03:44 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Rakkestad
Send a message via MSN to Snickers-is
Question High performance measuring software

Hi!

I am using LspCAD 6.0 PRO and the JustMLS can not keep up with the performance of LspCAD. I have looked at Praxis and Win MLS, but I am going to use it with my laptop. That makes WinMLS a very expensive solution as it requires an additional PCI-adapter.

Does anyone here have experience with measuring software usable for both normal room and anechoic chamber measurements?

Thanks
__________________
Live sounds better than HiFi.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2005, 04:12 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
If you can read german you should try hobbybox
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2005, 04:51 PM   #3
johnnyx is offline johnnyx  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: manchester
I have Praxis and I recommend it.
You may need an external sound device, because you need stereo line inputs which are not always implemented on laptops, the M-Audio Transit is good and inexpensive, so they say.
Praxis has many features, I've only scratched the surface so far, but it is easy to use. They keep updating the software too, with new features; you just download and install the latest version.
It will work well with Lsp CAD.

Here's the website, you can do quite a lot in the free "demo" mode. Try it on the JustMLS files.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2005, 05:37 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Rakkestad
Send a message via MSN to Snickers-is
One of the reasons why I need a new software is because JustMLS does something to the phase response that makes using the files in simulations very unaccurate. (The summed response does not look like the measured system response). Does anyone know anything about this problem?
__________________
Live sounds better than HiFi.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2005, 08:38 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Rakkestad
Send a message via MSN to Snickers-is
I have been looking at the following alternatives:

Praxis (www.libinst.com)
LMS (www.linearx.com)
CLIOwin(www.audiomatica.com)
MLSSA (www.mlssa.com)
WinAudioMLS (www.dr-jordan-design.de)
WinMLS (www.winmls.com)

Anyone with experiences?
__________________
Live sounds better than HiFi.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2005, 06:47 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ
Quote:
Originally posted by Snickers-is
One of the reasons why I need a new software is because JustMLS does something to the phase response that makes using the files in simulations very unaccurate. (The summed response does not look like the measured system response). Does anyone know anything about this problem?

Can you give us some more details? I have not used JustMLS before but I know people who do use it and there aren't any phase problems that I'm aware of. It might just be a simple setup problem.

Russ
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2005, 06:53 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Rakkestad
Send a message via MSN to Snickers-is
There should not be a setup problem as long as I have measured drivers in one cabinet from one location, connected them in parallell and the measured the total response. The result of summing the drivers in LspCAD does not come close to the measured response even with adjusted phase on each driver.
__________________
Live sounds better than HiFi.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2005, 07:17 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ
Quote:
Originally posted by Snickers-is
There should not be a setup problem as long as I have measured drivers in one cabinet from one location, connected them in parallell and the measured the total response. The result of summing the drivers in LspCAD does not come close to the measured response even with adjusted phase on each driver.

Your measurement setup is good. I have used this method myself with Clio and SoundEasy.

By setup, I meant setting up LspCAD to use your measurements. Not knowing what you have done, can you describe what you mean by "adjusted phase on each driver"? Sorry about asking such a basic question, but I think it will help you get your problem straightened out.

The measurements you took using the setup you describe will have "time of flight" plus the driver acoustic offset information in it as you probably know. These all have to be acounted for in the LspCAD model.

Russ
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2005, 07:35 PM   #9
morbo is offline morbo  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Have you set the driver acoustic centre offsets accurately? I seem to recall reading about someone having this problem and adjusting the driver offsets until the summed curve looked like the measured curve... I'll try to dig up the link again.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st January 2005, 07:45 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Rakkestad
Send a message via MSN to Snickers-is
Quote:
Originally posted by russbryant
Sorry about asking such a basic question, but I think it will help you get your problem straightened out.

Basic questions is often the simple way to solve a problem, so I am glad you're taking interest in my problem.

In JustMLS you set the distance to the speaker i a dialog box. You also have a reference probe connected to the speaker outpot to cancel any unlinearity in the amplifier and the soundcard.

In LspCAD you may set Z-distance to driver, negative and positive delay, scaling of measured data, scaling of impedance, driver orientation, driver position in x and y-axis, temperature coefficent, cooling, level of heatup, electrical polarity. It also has an extra transfer function that is disabeled by default.
__________________
Live sounds better than HiFi.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Measuring amp performance Sillyboy Class D 3 28th May 2006 02:49 AM
Measuring Stored Energy (software) cotdt Multi-Way 9 15th March 2006 06:08 PM
Measuring Performance? mwh-eng Solid State 8 1st March 2004 11:29 PM
Measuring amp performance mray Car Audio 1 29th February 2004 02:20 PM
loudspeaker measuring/design software Jean Multi-Way 11 20th November 2002 05:51 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:27 PM.

Page generated in 0.12608 seconds (80.73% PHP - 19.27% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio