|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
|
I'm using WinISD beta to do some box and port calculations. Funny thing is that as I increase the diameter of my round tube dimensions, the length of the tube "increases".. Model a smaller dia. tube and the length "decreases"..
This seems backwards to me. Should a larger tube require less length to tune? Thanks for any help you can give me.. Phil |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
|
No. The larger the cross-sectional area of the port, the longer the port must be to maintain a given tuning frequency.
It's in the math. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
How would you recommend to measure the length of a vent accurately when it has bends? Measure the length using a piece of string through the inside, or add up the lengths of the smallest paths?
__________________
There used to be a time, when penguins filled the sky! |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
|
I see. I guess I need to learn more about this. Thanks for clearing that up for me.
By the way.. Is WinISD accurate with vents, if you have the correct driver information and volume calculated? Does the vent tuning length include the area to the front face of the speaker baffle? It would seem that it would, but I am not sure. Thanks for the help.. Mag... |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Plovdiv
|
It should be useful if you get a vent with adjustable length, because all the calculations can't be that accurate we would like to. Also the form of the boxes gives an amount of standing waves you could not correct precalculate. The program uses the length of the tube itself and the cross-section area of it. It's better when you have a spectrum analizing software, so you could measure what finally have you built.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| issue WinISD port length Qes/Pe! | Amit_112dB | Subwoofers | 4 | 4th August 2007 06:26 AM |
| Port length in WinISD? | Marsh | Subwoofers | 10 | 1st July 2007 07:42 PM |
| WinISD vs. UniBox on port tuning | dscline | Subwoofers | 3 | 27th September 2006 05:39 PM |
| Winisd port configuration | toenail | Subwoofers | 3 | 30th January 2006 01:23 AM |
| Newbie winISD xover question | Sashi | Multi-Way | 1 | 28th December 2004 05:48 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07876 seconds (69.85% PHP - 30.15% MySQL) with 10 queries |