|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Mt. Pleasant SC
|
Ok.. I think I'm getting close to finalizing the design for my nest speaker and would like to get your thoughts. The design is a mixed Open Baffle,Dipole /sealed speaker. The woofer would be sealed, The mids will be open baffle, and I am thinking about putting a rearfiring tweeter on the back of the baffle too. The speaker will be active between the woofer and the mids/tweeter.
The drivers are ( I allready have them and therefore don't want to change them): Woofers: Peerless 10"CSX Mids: Either Vifa P13s or Peerless HDS 850488 Tweeter: Morel MDT33s Haven't decided on a rear tweeter yet. Any thoughts??? Here' a conceptual drawing. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bremerton, WA.
|
Why don't you want to mate with dipole woofers? Do you need the SPL capability?
Davey. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Long Island, NY
|
Hi Kestrel,
Very interesting design. Sorry I can't be much help with your questions, but I was curious about where you were going to XO from the woofers to the mids. Best, Ralph
__________________
Probably a silly question, but ........ |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: adelaide city of churches
|
your design looks very similar to lorpen audio models[ just google for lorpen and it will bring up the site and it does sound very nice the difference is the woofers which are 8 in in a br encl but to my knowledge does not use a rear firing tweet, [which to my thinking would diffuse the stereo image]cheers have fun TC
__________________
we all have problems only some people have more than most.... long live the Magyar (Hungarians) in the world! |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Georgia
|
FWIW...I like dipole best at low frequencies...best box is no box. Your general design is very good looking (like Phoenix/Orion hybrid) and could be adapted to dipole woofer very easily, unless you have large room/no sub.
Dipole upper mid and highs promote to many room reflections for me...depending on placement and room treatment, the sound may be on a "grand scale", but imaging can be weak. I have used P13...it can sound very smooth and polite, but not exceptionally detailed. "sorta" dipoles w/resistive loading |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Eminence or P.Audio ? Open Baffle or Sealed | Predator864 | Multi-Way | 0 | 23rd January 2009 11:51 AM |
| For Full Range With Subs -- Sealed Box Vs Open Baffle ? | DrDeville | Full Range | 4 | 21st January 2007 05:26 PM |
| Modelling a semi-open-baffle in WinISD for use with a sealed-box woofer? | Spasticteapot | Multi-Way | 2 | 27th November 2006 09:49 PM |
| DIY Open baffle / Sealed woofer design | preiter | Multi-Way | 11 | 25th August 2006 05:31 PM |
| Huge sealed vs open baffle | Flemming J P | Multi-Way | 13 | 27th April 2004 05:12 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08819 seconds (71.65% PHP - 28.35% MySQL) with 11 queries |