|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: boston
|
This may be a stupid question but what is required to measure the frequency response of speakers once one builds them. All I have is an spl meter and also a microphone. What program is used to generate those nice graphs etc... I'm totally new to this so any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
It's not a stupid question, but it's one whose answer could fill a book. And, in fact, it has: Joe d'Appolito's "Testing Loudspeakers" is extraordinarily useful.
Basic equipment you need is a test mike, a sound card, appropriate software (Speaker Workshop is popular and deservedly so), an amplifier, and a few bits of wire and resistors. You can be set up for under $200, even less if you've already got a calibrated test mike.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Windy City
|
FWIW - I don't think having the right equipment is the tough part, at least if you're using Speaker Workshop. Setting it up so you get consistent results can be an interesting saga.
Note: Not all sound cards are up to the task. And, room can play havoc with things. C |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
just another
diyAudio Moderator
|
couldn't agree more with cjd on the soundcard front!!! I started with a SB16 (woefull) then went to a turtle beach motego II (slightly better than woefull) and now have an Audigy II ZS which is excellent
![]() on the speaker workshop side of things make sure you get and read this: http://www.audiodiycentral.com/resou...nual%201.0.zip should save you a lot (but probably not all) of grief. Tony. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I'd just use the spl meter as a tool and and instrument for calibrating your ears. Your ears are much more sensitive than any spl meter once you get them used to what actual spl levels are accross the frequency range. I just disagree with this big focus on graphs. What matters is what your speakers sound like in your room at your listening position and that result is often so drastically different than what is measured at 1m using some crude attempt to create an anechoic test, that it's all but useless. Not to mention consistency.
Response graphs are useful in comparing different drivers to help decide which ones to buy. After that what matters is what they sound like.
__________________
Everyone has a photographic memory. It's just that most are out of film. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
I just use a Radio Shack SPL Meter. Even to adjust crossover points and slopes.
If I want a fancy graph I can input my data in a spreadsheet program. But why do that. Flat Is Flat..... |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
RJ, it's often useful to separate room effects from direct sound. Or to figure out polar pattern Or to see what's a diffraction effect and what's driver breakup. You just can't do that with a simple SPL meter. Impulse/MLS is much more versatile and powerful- and these days, it's no more expensive to do.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pickering, Ontario
|
Audiotester.de
I could have bought CLIO with all the hours I spent trying to get speaker workshop, my brain and my computer to cooperate. Audiotester works without hair pulling, is inexpensive, does basic things well enough, and you can try it out to the point of getting real measurements before buying.
__________________
Benford's law of controversy - Passion is inversely proportional to the amount of real information available. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to measure frequency response with a PC? | zafira1981 | Tubes / Valves | 26 | 1st April 2007 09:53 PM |
| What software to MEASURE response | Madmike2 | Multi-Way | 3 | 6th July 2005 08:19 AM |
| MTM - How to measure in room response? | Spearmint | Multi-Way | 9 | 13th November 2004 08:09 AM |
| how to measure freq response | skyraider | Solid State | 23 | 20th January 2004 07:08 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.37658 seconds (31.16% PHP - 68.84% MySQL) with 10 queries |