Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th January 2005, 08:37 AM   #1
foo is offline foo  Tibet
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: ...
Lightbulb Mid-woofer as midrange ?

What's the benefit to use a mid-woofer as a midrange ?
Why do a lot of comercial designs use such allignment?
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2005, 03:31 AM   #2
just another
diyAudio Moderator
 
wintermute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney
Blog Entries: 22
IMO the main reason is because most "midranges" don't go low enough to match up with 10" or bigger woofers.

My 10" vifa woofers should be run at less than 500 Hz (I'm going to be running them to only 300 max with my current work in progress. Try finding a dedicated midrange that will be happy down to 300Hz, I think you will be pushing it to find much that is happy below about 600-800Hz

the other factor is that the critical freq for human voice (often debated) is between about 300Hz and 3,000 Hz so, a good midbass can handle this without the need for any crossover point in this critical range. (3000 might be pushing it a bit for a 5")....

Tony.
__________________
Any intelligence I may appear to have is purely artificial!
Some of my photos
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2005, 03:45 AM   #3
foo is offline foo  Tibet
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: ...
BUT i think most midrange can also meet the area of 300hz~3000hz .
such as ss, vifa,etc .
there are so many mids can meet the spplication.
Especially Vifa P13MH is a cheap and good one.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2005, 04:12 AM   #4
just another
diyAudio Moderator
 
wintermute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney
Blog Entries: 22
I suppose it depends on your definition of midrange a lot of so called midranges would be otherwise called midbass It's a bit of a fuzzy area. As an example I would say the vifa P13 was more of a midbass than a midrange.

IMO a true midrange should be capable of working up to about 5000Hz comfortably, you just can't do that with a 5" driver cause it will start beaming well before that (around 2,500Hz from memory.....)

It's all about compromises.... a dome mid like the morel MDM55 will have great detail but lack in the low end..... a midbass will be good in the low end but probably won't have the definition of a dome..... short of going for a four way design you have to compromise one way or the other.... (or you could use a fullrange )

Tony.
__________________
Any intelligence I may appear to have is purely artificial!
Some of my photos
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2005, 06:27 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Tennessee
Send a message via AIM to bhg41088 Send a message via MSN to bhg41088 Send a message via Yahoo to bhg41088
Quote:
Originally posted by wintermute
IMO the main reason is because most "midranges" don't go low enough to match up with 10" or bigger woofers.

My 10" vifa woofers should be run at less than 500 Hz (I'm going to be running them to only 300 max with my current work in progress. Try finding a dedicated midrange that will be happy down to 300Hz, I think you will be pushing it to find much that is happy below about 600-800Hz

the other factor is that the critical freq for human voice (often debated) is between about 300Hz and 3,000 Hz so, a good midbass can handle this without the need for any crossover point in this critical range. (3000 might be pushing it a bit for a 5")....

Tony.
With this it seems like a CSS WR125s would make a great midrange. 6mm Xmax, and extension to 5khz. pair this with a good tweeter and woofer, like the Koda 8" or so and you'd have a great speaker.
__________________
-
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2005, 06:54 AM   #6
just another
diyAudio Moderator
 
wintermute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sydney
Blog Entries: 22
May seem so but if you check out the freq response graphs, it's off axis performance is not real great past 3Khz (which figures since it is a 4.5" driver).

http://www.creativesound.ca/pdf/WR125S.PDF

performance off axis is just as (more?) important as on axis. the rule of thumb is don't run the driver higher than the freq that beaming (directionality) starts to occur at, which is dependent on the diameter of the cone.

Tony.

edit: just realised that if you were refering to my 300 to 3000 Hz statement then yes I don't know that I would try and use it out to 5Khz though it's down at least 10db at 30 deg off axis at 5K.....
__________________
Any intelligence I may appear to have is purely artificial!
Some of my photos
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th January 2005, 12:01 AM   #7
Greg B is offline Greg B  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles, California
Quote:
the other factor is that the critical freq for human voice (often debated) is between about 300Hz and 3,000 Hz so, a good midbass can handle this without the need for any crossover point in this critical range. (3000 might be pushing it a bit for a 5")....
Yeah, well as you say, it's often debated. I actually prefer the more old school woofer/mid crossover of ~600-800 or so. It provides a natural solution to the baffle step for common speaker dimensions, and allows the use of a true midrange for more resolution.

AFA the critical freq, to my ears, I prefer having ~80-500 all coming from one driver. BTW, that pretty much covers the fundamentals of the human voice. Also, very generally, I prefer the sound of lower xmax true woofers.

An alternate 'modern' way of making a 3 way is to use a midwoofer for a midrange, cross lower, and use a high xmax woofer/subwoofer for the low frequencies. The advantage of this is that deeper bass can usually be achieved. The disadvantage is that it will typically be lower efficiency. The 'mid' will need BSC just as in a sub/sat design.

GB
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bandpass Woofer/Midrange? m@ Multi-Way 5 25th March 2006 02:10 AM
Audiom Woofer and Midrange GeorgeBoles Multi-Way 7 22nd September 2004 12:50 AM
woofer/midrange interference ? garlach Multi-Way 5 24th April 2004 08:03 PM
Picking woofer to midrange XO point Saurav Multi-Way 28 18th April 2004 07:28 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:29 PM.

Page generated in 0.10371 seconds (77.37% PHP - 22.63% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio