|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
  |
|
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
15th December 2004, 10:28 PM
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London
|
Going active with Snell Type E3s
I have a pair of Snell Type E mark IIIs driven by a 13W SET integrated, the EAR 859.
I'm rather tempted to get another 859 off of eBay and bi-amp, but then thought: why not go active? I understand that Snell match their drivers and crossovers, so the crossover is integral to the overall sound - therefore I need to be careful to make sure the active crossover matches the passive, presumably? Should I just replicate the passive crossover freq, Q and roll-off or is it more complicated? Or is this just a really stupid idea since I have no in-depth (since university Physics) knowledge of electronics?!?! Any comments based on experience welcome. Anyone like to compare the likely sonic performance of active vs biamp? Cheers - Ads |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Snell Type A Prototype........... | Uberpilot | Multi-Way | 9 | 31st October 2011 04:20 AM |
| Snell type EII/III | Hylle | Multi-Way | 0 | 10th August 2009 06:54 AM |
| Snell Type 1's | lt_texan | Multi-Way | 7 | 8th July 2009 02:55 AM |
| Snell type D | Skorpio | Multi-Way | 0 | 2nd September 2006 06:10 PM |
| Snell type JII question | amp-guy | Multi-Way | 0 | 17th March 2005 03:21 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.06517 seconds (71.40% PHP - 28.60% MySQL) with 10 queries |
