Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 13th December 2004, 05:52 PM   #1
jmikes is offline jmikes  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Boot Hill
Default Crossover math check

I'm still getting a handle on reading schematics and doing the math required for crossovers and I have a question. I was looking at the Angelfire crossover on the PartsExpress project showcase page, and the builder states the tweeter is crossover at 5150. When my rusty brain clanked into gear and worked out the numbers, I got a answer more like 3200. Can someone take a look at it for me?

Thanks in advance.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg afire_crossover.jpg (13.9 KB, 129 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2004, 05:55 PM   #2
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
 
Cal Weldon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: British Columbia
I'm no expert on Xovers but I was wondering why the take off for the tweeter is after the mid cap. Is this a common practice?

Cal

edit: The mid and tweet are only a 6 dB while the woof is 12? Is this also on purpose?
__________________
Next stop: Margaritaville
Some of Cal's stuff | Cal Weldon Consulting
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2004, 08:49 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Bill Fitzpatrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eugene, OR
It is common practice but put the 28mfd (most certainly electrolytic) in the tweeter line which some would consider very bad.

Even if you consider the series combination of the 2 caps, the crossover freq. disparity is probably due to the fact that the tweeters unfiltered response is also considered.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2004, 09:04 PM   #4
jmikes is offline jmikes  Canada
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Boot Hill
Quote:
Originally posted by Bill Fitzpatrick
It is common practice but put the 28mfd (most certainly electrolytic) in the tweeter line which some would consider very bad.
Not sure I understrand. Can you translate?

Quote:
Even if you consider the series combination of the 2 caps, the crossover freq. disparity is probably due to the fact that the tweeters unfiltered response is also considered.
I'm lost again. The tweeter (Morel 37) shows good response well below both of the stated crossover points. Why should it perform so badly with that circuit?
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2004, 09:19 PM   #5
Speakerholic
diyAudio Moderator
 
Cal Weldon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: British Columbia
You will note the signal has to go through the 28 cap before going to the 7.7 for the tweeter. Bill mentioned it was a common practice. I'm not sure why, it doesn't seem to make sence on the surface.

Nor do I understand using a bypass resistor on the woofer.
__________________
Next stop: Margaritaville
Some of Cal's stuff | Cal Weldon Consulting
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2004, 10:14 PM   #6
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally posted by Cal Weldon
You will note the signal has to go through the 28 cap before going to the 7.7 for the tweeter. Bill mentioned it was a common practice
I've seen this quite often... nets you a 6 uF cap on the tweeters (and no doubt means that the 7 uF cap has to handle a lot less power.

If you are calculating a text-book XO using an 8R loas you have to realize that the real impedance of the tweeter actually has little resemblance to an 8R resistor so the text book formulas are at most an optimistic guideline.

dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi
p10-hifi forum here at diyA
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2004, 10:30 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Bill Fitzpatrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eugene, OR
It's not a bypass resistor on the woofer, it's a zobel.

And now that I look at PEs project page I see that the 28mfd is a poly cap so that negates my comment about it being a bad idea.

So, I'd say that they did all that they did based on parts on hand and the need to do some response tailoring. The exact crossover freq. is often a nebulous number.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can you check this crossover repair job? silentblackhat Solid State 0 10th November 2008 12:55 AM
Check my math? Jalex420 Chip Amps 18 3rd June 2006 08:58 AM
double check the math tenderland Tubes / Valves 3 27th March 2006 04:48 PM
check my crossover rv1890 Multi-Way 18 25th February 2006 09:35 AM
DIY Sub with DAYTON RSS315HF-4 in progress; Can someone check my math? bcycle Subwoofers 18 7th February 2006 10:30 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:37 PM.

Page generated in 0.11329 seconds (70.88% PHP - 29.12% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio