Hi,
Here's my problem: I'm working on an active crossover project, and have just tested the LR4 alignment.
I thought that LR4 were supposed to pass squarewaves correctly (the summed output should be a squarewave), but mine doesn't
What's wrong?
Here's the (simplified) topology.
I think it's a LR4 alignment, since Q of one stage is 1/(3-Gain) and gain=1.58. Q=0.707 (butterworth)
2 cascaded 2nd order butterworth form a LR4
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attachment.php?s=&postid=518858&stamp=1101235143
input signal (red), the low pass output (green) and high pass output (blue)
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attachment.php?s=&postid=518852&stamp=1101234956
And here's the summed output
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attachment.php?s=&postid=518862&stamp=1101235302
Thanks for help
Here's my problem: I'm working on an active crossover project, and have just tested the LR4 alignment.
I thought that LR4 were supposed to pass squarewaves correctly (the summed output should be a squarewave), but mine doesn't
What's wrong?
Here's the (simplified) topology.
I think it's a LR4 alignment, since Q of one stage is 1/(3-Gain) and gain=1.58. Q=0.707 (butterworth)
2 cascaded 2nd order butterworth form a LR4
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attachment.php?s=&postid=518858&stamp=1101235143
input signal (red), the low pass output (green) and high pass output (blue)
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attachment.php?s=&postid=518852&stamp=1101234956
And here's the summed output
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/attachment.php?s=&postid=518862&stamp=1101235302
Thanks for help
I thought that LR4 were supposed to pass squarewaves correctly (the summed output should be a squarewave)
I don't think that's true.
Not square.
Bricolo,
Neither do I think the throughput should be square
Have you seen this article about 'transient perfect' filters?
http://www.geocities.com/kreskovs/CrossoverdocN.html
See also his main page on: http://www.geocities.com/kreskovs/John1.html
Some foods for thought and very inspiring.
Bricolo,
Neither do I think the throughput should be square
Have you seen this article about 'transient perfect' filters?
http://www.geocities.com/kreskovs/CrossoverdocN.html
See also his main page on: http://www.geocities.com/kreskovs/John1.html
Some foods for thought and very inspiring.
Bricolo said:
What's wrong?
Nothing. Your simulation results look correct to me. LR4 crossovers, as well as many other, won't sum and reproduce a square wave identical to the input. This is normal.
Cheers,
Davey.
Bill Fitzpatrick said:What is the crossover freq?
in the exemple, 1.6kHz
ScottG said:A 1st order highpass with a 4th order LR lowpass will, (or multiples of 1st orders ending with a 4th order LR lowpass).
With the same cutoff frequency? (at -3dB for 1st order and -6dB for the LR4)
Re: Not square.
Are thos the only transient perfect crossovers?
Henrik Juhl said:Bricolo,
Neither do I think the throughput should be square
Have you seen this article about 'transient perfect' filters?
http://www.geocities.com/kreskovs/CrossoverdocN.html
See also his main page on: http://www.geocities.com/kreskovs/John1.html
Some foods for thought and very inspiring.
Are thos the only transient perfect crossovers?
Bill Fitzpatrick said:I'm almost 100% sure that when I was prototyping fourth order filters many years ago I was getting a square wave out of the summer.
I think the reason you are not is because the input square wave (1KHz) is too close to the crossover frequency(1.6KHz). Try 100Hz.
Well isn´t the point to get a decent time behaviour around the Fc..?
Well above or below a low or highpass the roll off has less and less influence.
/Peter
I think some further reading is required here.
Here's a link to some information from the man that invented the Linkwitz-Riley 4th-order crossover:
http://www.linkwitzlab.com/frontiers.htm#F
The phase distortion from a 4th-order LR crossover is real. The group delay is not constant and these will not pass a square-wave undistorted. This is inherent in their design.
The big question is.....is this phase distortion audible?
Cheers,
Davey.
Here's a link to some information from the man that invented the Linkwitz-Riley 4th-order crossover:
http://www.linkwitzlab.com/frontiers.htm#F
The phase distortion from a 4th-order LR crossover is real. The group delay is not constant and these will not pass a square-wave undistorted. This is inherent in their design.
The big question is.....is this phase distortion audible?
Cheers,
Davey.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- Aren't 4th order LR crossovers supposed to pass squarewaves?