|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
|
I have 4 of the old Scan-Speak 18W/8544's that I'd like to use in a kit that was designed by Joe D'Appolito, the Model 717s.
The tweeter that was originally used was the D-29, now no longer in production I am told. I'm also told that the nearest thing to it and possibly a drop in replacement is the D2905/9300. If anyone has the specs for the D-29 so I could compare them, I'd appreciate it very much. Has anyonne here ever built this kit? Comments on it's performance................ Thanks in advancefor any help. Arthur
__________________
People who live in glass houses, should use the neighbor's bathroom. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Kristinehamn
|
Hi Arthur...
If you mean the SS D2905/9000 ( the forerunner of the 9300) I have a couple of these tweeters and a bad copy of their specs on paper... I've used these tweeters in this design intended for the 9300, wich worked fine btw. http://www.speakerbuilding.com/content/1021/ I've never heard the 9300 but compared to the 9500, 9700 and 9900 it lacks some detail and top end extension. I will scan the specs and email them to you during next week if you want to. One pequliar thing about them is that the dome is sticky and a LOT of dust get caught... Jonas |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: L.A., CA
|
I've built the exact speaker you are thinking about! I love them. I used two 18w8544 and the D9500 tweeter in the MTM configuration. Make sure you include baffle step compensation in your crossover or it will be overly forward sounding. I'll post the pictures later when I get home.
__________________
If it sounds good... it is good! |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
|
Quote:
Yes, I would very much appreciate the specs if you can send them. Thanks.
__________________
People who live in glass houses, should use the neighbor's bathroom. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
|
[QUOTE][COLOR=blue]I've built the exact speaker you are thinking about! I love them. I used two 18w8544 and the D9500 tweeter in the MTM configuration. Make sure you include baffle step compensation in your crossover or it will be overly forward sounding. I'll post the pictures later when I get home.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The speakers I'm planning were sold by the old A&S Speakers up in Northern Claifornia. and were sold as a kit. The only designation in the schematic is D-29 for the tweeter. The whole thing was desinged by Joe D'Appolito and operates as an 8 ohm load. External dimensions are 9.5 inches wide x 22inches high x 13 inces deep with a 7.5 inch long x 1.25 inch slot port. In looking over the other paperwork I find the designation of the Tweeter was D2905. Currently I'm using the 18w/8544's in a standard 2 way with a Focal tweeter crossed at 3kHz. I like the idea of the lower xover point of 2200 in the 717s.
__________________
People who live in glass houses, should use the neighbor's bathroom. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: USA
|
I believe the tweeters in the Signature 717 are the xxxx-9200.
The -9300 version is, as I understand it, essentially the same tweeter but with a non-stick coating on the dome. I believe that Madisound's catalog once mentioned that they'd replace the moving portions of a dead -9200 with the -9300 part. So, I think for the 717 system that the two tweeters can be considered interchangeable. I'd be somewhat careful about using the newer, fancier S-S tweeters mentioned above as they are not exactly the same in sensitivity and roll-off. I have a pair of these systems that I bought and they are very nice but have very little bass. Everything checks out dimensionally, but I think that maybe I overstuffed them. It was never clear from the rather skimpy information that A&S Loudspeakers generated exactly how much stuffing one should use. I should really get off my duff and un-stuff.
__________________
bel |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
|
Quote:
As to bass I'm not worried my sub will take over very nicely for bass augmentation. Like all speaker builders, Im chasing that airy soundstage that I think will be improved witht he new tweeter and more suitable xover. Not to worry, I would not use anything that didn't match in sensitivty unless I redisigned the xover, which is more than I want to tackle these days.
__________________
People who live in glass houses, should use the neighbor's bathroom. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
|
Quote:
Mark, I'm interested in building the same speakers that you built only using 18W8545-00. Would you post box dementions and xo's? Did you do a sealed design? Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: California
|
After doing another search I found what I assume is an old webpage for Speaker City that has specs for older Scan-Speak drivers.
It looks to me like the 9000, 9300, or 9500 would all work equally well. Thanks to everybody for their help. That web page is http://www.speakercity.com/specs/scan_ts.shtml
__________________
People who live in glass houses, should use the neighbor's bathroom. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: USA
|
Arthur,
Any idea on how much Acousti-stuff is equiivalant to a certain amount of wool? I actually tossed my wool before using and bought Acousti-stuff. Same reason as you The same weight of Acoustistuff gave me a huge pile. I couldn't begin to stuff it all into my 717's, but I still think I overstuffed.
__________________
bel |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Scan-Speak tweeter upgrade options? | gfinlayson | Multi-Way | 13 | 9th June 2009 02:06 PM |
| Scan Speak 9500 tweeter + kids = tears | zigzagflux | Multi-Way | 19 | 1st July 2007 05:29 AM |
| Scan Speak: old Revelator (9900) vs new neodimium tweeter | danyele | Multi-Way | 0 | 26th January 2007 11:18 AM |
| Selling 2 Scan Speak tweeter 95000 | andy2 | Swap Meet | 2 | 13th August 2006 11:41 AM |
| WTB: Scan-Speak D2010-8513 tweeter | genome | Swap Meet | 1 | 18th January 2006 01:46 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 3.20460 seconds (4.83% PHP - 95.17% MySQL) with 10 queries |