Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th July 2002, 05:16 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka State, India
Default Have you tried this Kaminsky crossover?

I came across the following crossover network in an old magazine.
This is a series network with modified Butterworth characteristics. The article claims that this configuration has all the desirable characteristics that an audiophile can dream of -- constant load, no phase shift etc.. :

The table attached to this article gives L and C values for various crossover frequencies from a 1971 article from Journal of Audio Engineering. For 500 and 5000Hz the values for L and C are 1.31 and 79.3 and .31 and 7.9.

Now my question is, if this configuration has all these advantages, why is this not popular as the "k" derived parallell configuration widely used commercially.

Has anyone in the forum tried this configuration? Please share your experience and opinion.
Attached Images
File Type: png xx.png (1.0 KB, 123 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2002, 08:16 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
sianturi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: France
Speaking of series crossover....

You can also check this out:
http://www.acoustic-reality.com/ar-sxo.htm

I read a website explaining why series xo is not so popular (forgot the url, though). It says that there is a "conspiracy" in audio industry not to use series xo (according to the writer's opinion). Reason:

1. SXO requires less component, so that DIY supplier cannot gain much from sxo.
2. A skeptic mind about changing the habit of using parallel xo to sxo.
3. bla, bla, bla...

But IMO, the main reason, may be because it's hard to predict the crossover freq. If you look at the website above, the method of designing the xo is "by ear," .... trial and error (the website gives some guidelines, though).

I'd like to give it a shot some day....

Cheers,
__________________
The Great Saiyaman
Siapa bertelinga hendaklah ia mendengar... (Mat 13:9)
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2002, 08:22 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
sianturi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: France
Uh yeah.... I remember.

Here's why sxo is not so popular.

http://home.iprimus.com.au/gradds/se...oss-overs7.htm


Cheers,
__________________
The Great Saiyaman
Siapa bertelinga hendaklah ia mendengar... (Mat 13:9)
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Crossover for vifa 2 way setup - how can I find out what this crossover is doing? Tino Multi-Way 11 17th May 2009 04:21 AM
Help me with a crossover. raypalmer Multi-Way 4 5th April 2009 01:48 AM
crossover 2-way Beto Chip Amps 3 23rd January 2009 04:05 PM
Passive crossover into active crossover hahfran Multi-Way 16 10th February 2008 06:16 PM
Can you hear the crossover point of a speaker with a well-designed crossover? 454Casull Multi-Way 11 2nd April 2004 05:48 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:46 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2